How the Boston bombing is already being exploited to
introduce tyranny
Before it’s news – John Rolls
– 4/24/2013
For a few days, Boston became an Orwellian
nightmare. The city lockdown and subsequent militarization was swift,
though any intelligent and guilty suspect could have easily left the area
before hand.
It was an exercise designed
to test the malleability of the American people during a crisis scenario.
In Watertown,
residents were not only forced into lockdown; they were also subjected to
house-to-house searches without warrant, pat downs, and numerous other
violations of their 4th Amendment rights. Take note that almost everything below is an illegal and
unconstitutional action on the part of Boston
authorities:
Martial Law Conditioning
Finally, we get to the
“heroes” The point of a false flag is to frighten the
population of any given nation into relinquishing freedom in the name of
safety, which in the process gives the central government even more
control.
As this was occurring,
officials were consistently pushing media cameras away from the area in the
name of “safety”, even though media cameramen are sent into domestic shootouts
and foreign warzones on a regular basis. The only real purpose that I can
see to removing them from the scene was to reduce the amount of video footage
depicting these illegal searches and seizures:
The dynamics of liberty have
just been erased. This kind of behavior on the part of government will
not be limited to disasters like Boston, or New Orleans during
Katrina; a precedence is being set to
use martial law-style tactics anywhere for any reason at anytime.
The “national security argument” is being used as a free license to institute
any measure regardless of law to achieve a particular combat objective.
The environment we saw in the dark days of Boston is an environment we’ll soon see all
over the country, and here is why…
Free Speech Is Next
During the height of the
civil rights marches of the 50’s and 60’s, tactics were used to silence
dissent. Black protesters were told that they could not obtain proper
permits for peaceful marches because their “own safety” and the safety of the
public could not be ensured. This matter of using broad hypothetical
dangers as a catalyst for censorship was finally argued before the Supreme
Court in Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham.
The court sided with the protestors, pointing out that the use of undefined
safety concerns and “prior restraint” to silence speech was
unconstitutional. Unfortunately, the decision has not prevented the U.S. government
from slowly undermining public protest rights ever since.
The fascinating thing about
incremental tyranny is the way in which naïve members of our society try to
rationalize it. They debate using logical fallacies like:
“How have your rights been violated in particular? If your rights
haven’t been violated, what right do you have to complain?”
And how about this gem…
“Yeah, there are problems in this country, but at
least we have some freedom. In many countries, you wouldn’t be allowed to
complain the way you are…”
This is statist psychology
at work. Freedom, in their minds, is a privilege doled out by
governments, rather than an inborn attribute outside of the realm of law.
They do not understand that the violation of the rights of one American is a
violation of the rights of ALL Americans. They do not understand that the
destruction of some constitutional protections will one day lead to the
destruction of ALL constitutional protections.
THE BOTTOM LINE? OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES ARE NOT UP
FOR COMPROMISE. PERIOD. SHOOTINGS, BOMBS, NUKES, NOTHING!
THERE IS NO RATIONALIZATION THAT WILL EVER MAKE TYRANNY A MORAL ENTERPRISE. I, LIKE
MANY OTHER AMERICANS, DO NOT CARE WHAT BOOGEYMAN FANTASY IS PARADED IN FRONT OF
ME. WE ARE NOT FRIGHTENED, AND WE ARE NOT IGNORANT. NO ATTACK, NO
MATTER HOW HEINOUS, WILL EVER CONVINCE US TO HAND OVER OUR FREEDOM.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Posts
