Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts

Saturday, September 21, 2013

SINGAPORE SOLVES WELFARE – WHY CAN’T U.S.?



What we can learn from Singapore
Townhall – John C. Goodman – 9/21/2013

Click the link to read this entire article – ONE NATION ACTUALLY SOLVED PROBLEMS!!

In 1984, Singapore instituted a revolutionary idea: a system of compulsory saving for medical expenses. That was the same year my colleagues and I at the National Center for Policy Analysis introduced the idea of Health Savings Accounts in this country.

After almost three decades, Singapore has now come to the attention of a lot others, including a book by Brookings, and a whole slew of posts by bloggers.
At the risk of disappointing you, Singapore does not have a free market for health care. What it does have is an alternative to the European/American welfare state, in which private saving and private insurance do what employers and governments do in other countries. The Singapore philosophy is:

• Each generation should pay its own way.
• Each family should pay its own way.
• Each individual should pay his own way.
• Only after passing through these three filters, should anyone turn to the government for help.

If the United States adopted a similar approach to public policy, there would be no deficit problem in this country.

A shift from the public to the private sector. The most important thing Singapore has accomplished in health care (in contrast to all the other developed countries) is an enormous shift of money and power from the government to the private sector. Since 1984, the Singaporean government's share of the nation's total health care expenditure dropped from about 50% to 20%. When you stop to think about it, that's incredible.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Thursday, April 11, 2013

FRAUD IS THEFT – AND THE WORKING TAXPAYER IS DISGUSTED


Disability Scammer Caught on Tape
Conservative Byte – 4/11/2013

3-minute video


For some reason, people think that because other people are committing crimes, it's OK for them to commit crimes too.

WE DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO WRONG.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Friday, February 1, 2013

IS SOCIAL SECURITY A RIP OFF FOR AMERICANS?


SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT / ENTITLEMENT!

Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it. 

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a “Federal Benefit Payment.”This isn’t a benefit – its earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.

It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both your and your employer’s contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!

30,000 X 15% = $4,500 / year X 40 years = $180,000.

$4,500 / 12 months = $375 / month.
Save $375 each month for 40 years = $180,000.
Compound your savings and keep what you earned.

It’s easier to live on 4% of $1,300,000 ($52,000 / year) than $1,000 / month from Social Security.  Social Security keeps $40,000 of your retirement funds every year.

And what do your family and heirs receive from Social Security after you pass on?  Certainly not a million dollars.


Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Thursday, January 17, 2013

SECRETARY TIM GEITNER: WE MUST BORROW MORE TO PAY CURRENT BILLS

Tim Geithner admits Social Security is Bankrupt

Godfather Politics – Mark Home – 1/16/2013

Nation-states . . . sold bonds (which is the same thing as borrowing money) so that people could “invest in” the nation.

All the money paid as a tax to Social Security is “saved” by this process. The money is used to buy government bonds which are then later to be cashed in when there is a need for the money.

But when you buy a bond from the government, your money is not used to create new capital. Typically, it is simply spent on immediate consumption. Nothing is built (at least nothing that anyone wants). Nothing is really invested. Instead, the one who is hoping to get the interest that the bond promises is merely betting that the government can increase taxes in the future and pay the bond owner from those revenues. No value is added.

When your money is “saved” from your payroll tax to “go into” Social Security, it is actually used to buy Treasuries. But that just means that your money that is “saved” in social security is actually loaned to the government and immediately spent. Nothing is saved at all. Whether or not Social Security can be paid depends entirely on whether or not current taxes can be raised high enough to cover them.

Timothy Geithner, in order to make Congress raise the debt ceiling, has admitted the truth. He wrote a letter to House speaker Boehner:

“The U.S. government makes approximately 80 million separate payments per month. These include payments for:

  • Social Security
  • Supplemental Security Income
  • Medicare
  • Medicaid
  • National Security Needs
  • Including military salaries, military retirement, veterans’ benefits, and defense contractors
  • Income tax refunds
  • Federal employee salaries and retirement
  • Law enforcement and operation of the justice system
  • Unemployment insurance
  • Disaster relief
  • Goods and services sold to the government under contracts with small and large businesses
  • Many others
If Congress does not act to extend borrowing authority, all of these payments would be at risk. This would impose severe economic hardship on millions of individuals and businesses across the country.” (emphasis added).


Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Saturday, October 27, 2012

SOCIAL SECURITY IS GOING BANKRUPT

Social Security is going bankrupt
Tea Party Economist – Gary North – 10/26/2012
I want to talk about the inevitable bankruptcy of the Social Security system. I have made this case publicly for 35 years.
The beginning of the bankruptcy began in fiscal year 2010. Early in that year, I produced a 90-minute video predicting that this would happen before the end of the fiscal year.
Retirement Armageddon – Gary North – 90 minutes
THE TRUST FUND’S DEFICIT
Here is the assessment by the Trustees in their 2012 Annual Report. They tell us that the program is producing a deficit.
In 2011, Social Security’s cost continued to exceed both the program’s tax income and its non-interest income, a trend that the Trustees project to continue throughout the short-range period and beyond. The 2011 deficit of tax income relative to cost was $148 billion, and the projected 2012 deficit is $165 billion. The sizes of these deficits are largely due to a temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax for 2011 and 2012.
The legislation establishing the payroll tax reduction also provided for transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to the trust funds to “replicate to the extent possible” revenues that would have occurred in the absence of the payroll tax reduction. Including these general revenue reimbursements, the 2011 deficit of non-interest income relative to cost was $45 billion, and the projected 2012 deficit is $53 billion (page 2).
Where did the money come from to offset the deficit? The Trustees were quite clear: “transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to the trust funds.”

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Sunday, September 23, 2012

YOUR SHARE INCLUDES WORK AND SAVING FOR YOUR FUTURE

Your Fair Share
http://townhall.com/columnists/johncgoodman/2012/09/22/your_fair_share/page/full/
Townhall – John C. Goodman – 9/22/2012

This is a long article, well documented with solutions to America’s current tax burden

Perhaps you have an answer. The median household income in the United States is $50,054, according to the latest Census Bureau report. People earning up to this amount are contributing almost nothing to the operations of the federal government, even though the government is spending one out of every four dollars in our economy.

When you couple that with the fact that nearly half the population is receiving at least one entitlement benefit, we have a dangerous political situation on our hand. If roughly half the population is receiving and not paying, they have an obvious self interest in seeing taxes and spending go higher and higher. This could be a ticket to national bankruptcy.

So back to the original question. What portion of the federal burden should each of us pay? Actually, I have an answer. It's called the Biblical tithe.

One of the reasons why tax rates are so high is that about half of all the income earned in our economy is not taxed at all. This income escapes taxation, courtesy of the standard deduction and tons of other deductions, credits and loopholes in the tax code. What if we wiped out all of these escape routes and taxed all income at one low rate? Then we would all be paying a tax rate of about 10%.

If we want to replace the corporate income tax as part of reform, our rate would have to rise to 11%. But with these low rates the economy would be more efficient. It would grow faster. More income would be reported. Taking that into consideration, it looks like an across-the-board rate of 10 percent is all we would need to replace the personal and corporate income taxes we are now paying. As Dick Armey used to say, most of us could fill out our tax returns on a post card!

Ah, but we're not done yet. There is the not so small issue of the payroll tax, which currently stands at 15.3 percent. Although we are told that workers who pay this tax are contributing to their Social Security and Medicare benefits, in fact all the money is spent the very minute it comes in the door. If each of us were saving for our own retirement, we would need to put aside only half that much. Instead workers are paying 15.3 percent of every paycheck — not for themselves, but for someone else's benefits.

Moreover, unlike the income tax, the payroll tax is actually very regressive. That's because we only pay it on the first $110,000 of income. All income above that level gets off scot free. If we integrate the income and payroll tax, we're now looking at about a 20 percent tax on all income. That's a double tithe. And we're not done yet.

So where does that leave us? With a flat tax rate of about 28%. Interestingly this is the rate Ronald Reagan left us with as part of tax reform in 1988.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Sunday, September 9, 2012

PRESIDENT OBAMA AND INCREASING DEBT

Did You Notice Who He Threatened?

Did you notice who President Obama threatened in 2011 when he wasn't getting his way on raising the debt ceiling? He threatened to not pay:
SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREES
MILITARY RETIREES
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY AND FEDERAL RETIREES

- He did not threaten to stop payments to illegal aliens
- He did not threatened to take frivolous benefits such as Internet access away from violent inmates
- He did not offer to fire some of the thousands of unnecessary federal employees that he hired
- He did not offer to cut down on his or his wife's frivolous gallivanting around
- He did not threaten to not pay the senators and representatives or any of their staff
- He did not threaten to take benefits away from welfare recipients
- He did not threaten the food stamp programs
- He did not threaten to not pay foreign aid
- He did not threaten to cut back on anything that involves his base voters

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Sunday, September 2, 2012

ENTITLEMENT REFORMS WILL CHANGE ENTITLEMENTS--DUH

ENTITLEMENT REFORMS
GOP USA – Thomas Sowell – 8/28/2012
 
There are people who take seriously such statements as those by President Barack Obama that Republicans want to "end Medicare as we know it."

Let's stop and think, if only for the novelty of it. If you make any change in anything, you are ending it "as we know it." Does that mean that everything in the status quo should be considered to be set in concrete forever?

If there were not a single Republican, or none who got elected to any office, arithmetic would still end "Medicare as we know it," for the simple reason that the money in the till is not enough to keep paying for it. The same is true of Social Security.

Neither Social Security nor Medicare has ever had enough assets to cover its liabilities. Very simply, there has never been enough money put aside to do what the government promised to do.

These systems operate on what their advocates like to call a "pay as you go" basis. That is, the younger generation pays in money that is used to cover the cost of benefits for the older generation. This is the kind of financial pyramid scheme that got Charles Ponzi put in prison in the 1920s and got Bernie Madoff put in prison in our times.

It is today's young people who are going to be left holding the bag when they reach retirement age and discover that all the money they paid in is long gone. It is today's young people who are going to be dumped over a cliff when they reach retirement age, if nothing is done to reform entitlements.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Friday, April 20, 2012

SOCIAL SECURITY – WHO GAVE IT TO YOU, AND NOW WHO’S TAXING YOU FOR YOUR BENEFITS

The Unknown History of Social Security and the Social Security Card
Godfather Politics – 4/19/2012

After violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats have accused Republicans of wanting to take away your Social Security. And the worst part is uninformed citizens believe it!

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Sunday, October 2, 2011

PAYING FEDERAL RETIREMENT PLANS THROUGH TAXES AND BORROWING

USA TODAY – 10/1/2011 – Dennis Cauchon
Federal Retirement Plans Almost as Costly as Social Security

Retirement programs for former federal workers — civilian and military — are growing so fast they now face a multitrillion-dollar shortfall nearly as big as Social Security's, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The federal government hasn't set aside money or created a revenue source similar to Social Security's payroll tax to help pay for the benefits, so the retirement costs must be paid every year through taxes and borrowing.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Thursday, September 22, 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY, PONZI SCHEME AND PAYING "FAIR SHARE"


The Patriot Post – Walter E. Williams – 9/21/2011

Gov. Perry’s Right About Social Security

Another lie in the Social Security pamphlet is: "Beginning November 24, 1936, the United States government will set up a Social Security account for you. ... The checks will come to you as a right." Therefore, Americans were sold on the belief that Social Security is like a retirement account and money placed in it is our property. The fact of the matter is you have no property right whatsoever to your Social Security "contributions."

In a U.S. Supreme Court case, Helvering v. Davis (1937), the court held that Social Security is not an insurance program, saying, "The proceeds of both (employee and employer) taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like internal revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way."
In a later Supreme Court case, Flemming v. Nestor (1960), the court said, "To engraft upon the Social Security system a concept of 'accrued property rights' would deprive it of the flexibility and boldness in adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands."
The Social Security Administration is trying to clean up its history of deception in its website (http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html)

Three Nobel laureate economists have testified that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. Dr. Paul Samuelson called it "the greatest Ponzi game ever contrived." Dr. Milton Friedman said it was "the biggest Ponzi scheme on earth." Dr. Paul Krugman predicted that "the Ponzi game will soon be over."

BLOGGER COMMENT: If Social Security is "means tested", that is,wealthy people who pay into the system for years but are denied Social Security payments because of personal wealth, should they be allowed to keep their own money and discontinue payments into Social Security at age 65 if they continue to earn a living.

ALSO, shouldn't wealthy individuals deserve a TAX CREDIT for every penny they paid into Social Security for decades?  They most likely started out NOT wealthy and prospered as they moved up the ladder as responsibilities increased and income grew.  So these individuals paid into Social Security assuming it would be part of their retirement package.  Then, upon retirement, decades of contributions are denied them (hundreds of thousands of dollars) and President Obama insists they continue to "pay their fair share. 

To me, this is GOVERNMENT THEFT. 

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY: YOUNG PEOPLE ARE THE LOSERS

Walter E. Williams:  Social Security is 'a rip-off of young people'
The Daily Caller -- Walter E. Williams -- 9/13/2011


http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/13/walter-e-williams-social-security-is-a-rip-off-of-young-people/

“There are three Nobel laureate economists who agree with them as well as many other people. You know, Paul Samuelson, Milton Friedman and even Paul Krugman said Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and it is a ripoff of young people to older people and represents a redistribution of income from young people to older people because young people will never see a dime of Social Security. Instead it will be bankrupt by the time they retire.”

Williams also criticized other government efforts at so-called “social justice,” and started with the government education system.

Reaching into somebody else’s pockets to help one’s fellow man is worthy of condemnation. And for the Christians among us when God gave Moses the Commandments, ‘Thou shalt not steal,’ he did not mean unless you get a majority vote in Congress.”

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Monday, August 22, 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY -- PERSONAL ACCOUNT OPTIONS


Forbes Magazine -- 3/31/2011

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2011/03/31/a-personal-account-option-for-social-security/

Long article but something that Americans must consider.

With this approach, because standard, long term, market investment returns are so much higher than the implicit returns paid by completely noninvested, pay-as-you-go Social Security, all workers who exercise the personal accounts would receive more in benefits through the personal accounts earning standard long term returns than the Social Security benefits they replace.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Friday, July 15, 2011

SHATTERING THE SOCIAL SECURITY MYTH

 
Human Events -- 7/14/2011
But last Tuesday, President Obama said, “I cannot guarantee that [Social Security] checks go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue.  Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do this.”
 
READER COMMENT:  Let every SS recipient make the following calculation: 1) get from the SSA the complete list of your annual contributions; 2) add your company's SS payments made in your name (that is by how much your salary was reduced); 3) add income tax you paid in your personal SS contribution; 4) sum up the 3 amounts and invest the sum in the 5% tax-free municipal or state bonds; 5) repeat this process for all your working years until retirement. You will then have the real value of your payments. Compare now this capital to your miserable monthly SS payment. In my case the value after 33 years of work of this personal fund was $1,800,000, earning tax-free return of $90,000/year, or $7,500/month, without touching the capital which I could have left to my inheritors. Compare that amount with my actual payment of $1,400/month. The difference illustrates the amounts stollen from me by this gigantic, criminal Ponzi scheme.
 
Scroll down a bit to see Obama’s Lie:  June Revenues ($248 billion) and June Expenditures ($213 Billion)

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY -- THE YOUNG LOSE OUT

http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MTMyNzAwNDM

. . . conservatism is in a good position in Wisconsin. It's been solidified by a growing infrastructure, from an unusually vibrant talk radio scene to a plethora of free-market think tanks and watchdogs. It's grounded mainly in the reality that, while progressives historically have seen the state as their natural property, conservatism's offer of restrained, sustainably priced government is now more in tune with much of the state's middle.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com