Sunday, August 31, 2014


Five civil questions to post to your liberal friends
God Father Politics – David Bahnsen – 8/30/2014

This article is NOT intended as a device to make an argument in and of itself – these are real QUESTIONS – not answers.

1. Do you believe public employee unions have been a constructive force in American society or a destructive one? If the latter, do you acknowledge the relationship between public employee unions and the Democratic party/agenda, and how do you feel about that? If you believe they’ve been a constructive force in American society, could you elaborate?

2. Are you for MORE government in American lives or LESS government? The confusion lies in the left’s pretty consistent opposition to things like school choice and health care freedom, but pretty consistent support for things like abortion rights and gay marriage. Should we want more government for some things and less for others, and if so, how do you draw those lines?

3. Would you consider the “war on poverty” of the last fifty years to have been a success? If so, by what basis do you see it as such? If not, what do you think was done wrongly and by what basis do you think even greater federal government intervention would succeed in defeating poverty?

4. Do you like big money in politics or dislike it? If you dislike it, do you believe it should be demonized when the last name is Soros and Steyer or only Koch? At what economic point does a person lose his or her right to participate in elections, and regardless of what that point is, do you believe it applies to both parties or just one?

5. Does the economy function better with greater regulation or less regulation? If the former, can you think of an industry or company or product or innovation that has thrived with more regulation? If the latter, do you believe the current Democratic Party is committed to freer markets or more restrictive markets? Which one is better for middle class people?

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Wednesday, August 27, 2014


The Agenda 21 Depopulation of rural areas will give Obama Stalin-like control over food
Freedom Outpost – Dave Hodges – 8/27/2014

The plan is called America 2050 and the concept is based upon the creation of megacities. In order for the megacities concept, which is well underway, to come to fruition, American suburbs and rural areas must be completely depopulated. This process is underway and the Obama administration is accelerating the process.

This will come as a shock to many reading this article because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN. However, in actuality, the process of moving the United States towards a complete Agenda 21-style of total urbanization has already commenced and it began nearly 20 years ago. In the case of total urbanization, the United States is in the process of dividing the country into 11 large densely populated urban centers.

NAFTA Was the Beginning of Rural Flight In the United States
The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it is credited with greatly accelerating illegal immigration, and almost immediately bankrupted over three million farmers in northern Mexico and this group became the vanguard of millions of Mexicans illegally entering the US in search for subsistence work of any type.

The second dramatic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had catastrophic consequences for U.S. farmers as a record number of small farmers have lost their farms and have gone through foreclosure while the government subsidized corporate farms have thrived. Since NAFTAthe average annual growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% higher. Also since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small family farms have gone bankrupt which represents a decline of 21% of family farms in the U.S.

The US Government Is Gaining Control Over All Food

Through the collectivization of the food production, the Chinese government is working towards gaining complete control over all food in order to control the people. On an ever increasing basis, NAFTA is providing the U.S. government with the exact same ability.

Therefore, the third draconian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefarious free trade agreements and executive orders, which led to the loss of control for local communities over their own food supply.

With the stroke of his pen, Obama has total and absolute control over all food where his EO 13603  states:

e)  "Food resources" means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption.  "Food resources" also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.

(f)  "Food resource facilities" means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer…"

NAFTA was merely the opening artillery bombardment against the American farmer and the ultimate depopulation of rural areas. The death of the American farmer will ultimately come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be fully implemented when Obama declares martial law

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


30 Population control quotes that show that the Elite truly believe that Humans are a plague upon the earth
Freedom Outpost – Michael Snyder – 8/17/2014

The following are 30 population control quotes which show that the elite truly believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and that a great culling is necessary…
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Tuesday, August 26, 2014



In the case of Gonzalez v. PPLA, Mr. Gonzalez alleges that the California affiliates of Planned Parenthood systematically and illegally overbilled the state and federal government for birth control drugs and devices, including ones that can cause very early abortions. Basically, according to the complaint, when Planned Parenthood distributed such birth control to indigent persons, Planned Parenthood was allowed to seek government reimbursement for what Planned Parenthood paid for the birth control – Planned Parenthood’s “acquisition cost” – but WHAT PLANNED PARENTHOOD DID INSTEAD WAS BILL THE GOVERNMENT FOR MUCH HIGHER AMOUNTS, SOMETIMES MORE THAN TEN TIMES “ACQUISITION COST,” RESULTING IN ILLEGAL OVERCHARGES (AND PAYMENTS) IN EXCESS OF $200 MILLION.

As ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow says, “No one should be allowed to scam the government – which means bilking the taxpayers.  Our client accuses Planned Parenthood of cheating taxpayers out of more than $100 million. All we ask of the court of appeals is the chance to prove those allegations.”

We’ll continue our fight to hold Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, accountable for their actions.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Wisconsin Public Employees’ Health Plan Second Best in the Nation
MacIver Institute – Matt Crumb – 8/15/2014

Open the link – scroll to the first gray box – Wisconsin is listed last, but pays the most.

For Wisconsin government employees, the nationwide benchmark shows they have some of the best health coverage in the country at a lower personal cost.
State contributions to Wisconsin employee health plans exceeded the national average for the ratio of employer to employee payments in 2013. WISCONSIN TAXPAYERS PAY 87 PERCENT AND 13 PERCENT COMES FROM STATE EMPLOYEES. Nationally, states pay on average 84 percent towards health care coverage and workers pay 16 percent of the overall cost, which means WISCONSIN TAXPAYERS ARE STILL PICKING UP MORE OF THE TAB ON AVERAGE THAN OTHER STATES.

Wisconsin state employees also enjoy very generous health plans compared to other states, and Act 10 has done little to change that. The Pew report shows Wisconsin's "actuarial value" for state health benefits to be 97 percent, tied for second highest in the nation. The actuarial value measures a health plan's "richness" by calculating the percent of costs that are covered by the plan for an average employee, based on "the required deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance." An actuarial value of 85 would require the employee to cover 15 percent of health care costs.

ON AVERAGE, WISCONSIN GOVERNMENT PAYS A MONTHLY PREMIUM OF $1,331 FOR EACH EMPLOYEE AND THEIR DEPENDENTS. That is the third-highest average monthly premium in the nation and 32 percent higher that the national average of $963.


Wisconsin taxpayers pick up more of the cost for that health care coverage than the national average.

Full Report – 52-page PDF

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Monday, August 25, 2014


As has been stated for over a year, AND during the OCT, 2013 hearings, AND during the SB619 hearings; the goal of the assessments is to drive curriculum per the CEO of PARCC.

In response to PARCC’s press release, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s (R) website published the following statement:
The proponents of Common Core and PARCC continue to insist that tests and standards are not about curriculum, but that’s a ruse. Teachers already know that what is tested at the end of the year is what is taught in classrooms throughout the year. PARCC may not mandate one textbook or one pacing guide, but the CEO of the federally funded PARCC has admitted one thing: PARCC controls instruction and instruction is curriculum.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today.

Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on his writings.

Barack Obama writes about him in his books.

Saul David Alinsky, a writer, was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of the modern community organizing movement. He is most noted for his book Rules for Radicals.

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA
Education: University of Chicago Spouse: Irene Alinsky
Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals

Anyone out there think that this stuff isn't happening today in the U.S. ?
All eight rules are currently in play.

How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.

The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control– Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives. (Food, Housing, and Income)

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will
cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States ?

Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule. Stalin described his converts as "Useful Idiots"  The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Sunday, August 24, 2014


This is Canada's Top Ten List of America's Stupidity

      Number 10 Only in America could  politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00  per plate Obama campaign fund-raising event.

       Number 9 Only in America  ...could people claim that the government still  discriminates against black Americans when they have a   black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of  the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the  population is black 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to  black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate  that go to Hispanics!

      Number 8  Only in America...could  they have had the two people most responsible for our tax  code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department)  and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means  Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor  of higher taxes.

       Number 7 Only in America...can they  have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have  the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be  harmed by the backlash.

      Number 6 Only in America...would they  make people who want to legally become American citizens  wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of  thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss  letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just  'magically'  become American citizens (probably should  be number one).

      Number 5  Only in America....could  the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking  by the country's Constitution be thought of as   EXTREMIST’S.

      Number 4 Only in America...could yoU  need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy  alcohol, but not to vote.

      Number 3  Only in America...could  people demand the government investigate whether oil  companies are gouging the public because the price of gas  went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S.  Oil company(Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company  making tennis shoes (Nike).

      Number 2  Only in America... could  you collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation  in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more  than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER  MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough  money.

      And Number 1 Only in America...could  the rich people- who pay 86% of all income taxes – be  accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't  pay any income taxes at all.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Wednesday, August 13, 2014


Second Amendment does not “give” us a right to keep and bear arms
God Father Politics – Gary DeMar – 8/11/2014

The right existed before the Bill of Rights was drafted and passed.
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wikipedia gets it right:

“The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms.”
ESTHER 8:11 - 9:16

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Puzzle for all you smart people

One good puzzle usually breeds another. But in this real circumstance puzzle, an accurate specific answer may not be known by any of us regular folk living north of our southern border. But it does breed strong curiosity…..  

Puzzle One:

Imagine you are a 3-year old to 8-year old child. You are on your own without adults. You are asked to walk from  Houston, Texas, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, on your own with no food or belongings to sustain you. Then you are asked to walk an additional 100 miles  past Minnesota.  Could you do it?

How long would it take you as a 6-year old? That is the minimum distance these poor, helpless  little ones have supposedly walked from Central America to the border of Texas, again, on their own. They didn't get lost.

And they survived the journey without help (unless you buy into the notion that a destitute out-of-work family, run out of their homes by gangs, and living in squalor somehow came up with $8,000 to $10,000 for EACH child to pay a coyote to take  them to the border).

Puzzle Two:

Now, on the map, you must start somewhere in the green area. Let's make it easy and start where green meets orange, so that you had the least mileage by not having to cover  the whole green area. Just start where the green meets the orange. Blue, of course, is water.

Your task is to figure a route from the green area to the purple area without going into the  blue area and avoiding towns and cities in the orange area. The black line is  the distance from the nearest town to Mexico's southern border that touches  the green area to Laredo, Texas, one of the CLOSEST purple towns. 1,220 miles  across desert and
mountains with no equipment, food, or help.

If orange had  stopped these innocents where orange touches green, problem would not have occurred. However, what 6-year old do you know who could walk 1,220 miles  (minimum), probably more like 1,500 miles, on their own without dying?

How many days would  it take for a 6-year old to walk 1,220 miles without help, directions, food, sun protection, etc.?

I don't think the whole truth is being  given to us, folks……Someone created and assisted this, and the media should be figuring out who it is

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Saturday, July 26, 2014


1776 2.0:  The front lines of the New Revolt
Affluent Investor – Jerry Bowyer – 7/11/2014

It seems to be that as the United States federal government and the Presidency in particular have gradually morphed into something more like a European monarchy, our attitude towards its sovereignty has shifted. Certainly no state or province or faction of the ruling class would dare to challenge the military might of the United States in a single act of open revolt. But as time goes on we challenge it in small acts of secret revolt. Violation, for example, of our draconian system of immigration laws has become quite common. How many appointees to the federal bench or to the office of Attorney General must be caught in nannygate scandals involving child care payments to illegal aliens made under the table before we get the fact that our governing class, even that part which is directly pledged to enforce the law, routinely ignore this law?

Businesses split in half so as to be qualified for small business exemptions from federal regulation. Farmers look the other way when they hire day laborers who clearly are not citizens. Federal regulators write their regulations, and financiers change their form of organization in unforeseen ways to avoid the regulations, even ones they pushed for.

And most people have absolutely no moral compunction about any of these violations of either the spirit or letter of the law, because deep down they no longer believe that the law, especially the tax code, represents any compelling moral principle, nor do its dictates any longer seem to be fair. They don’t think their home state has earned taxes on the Amazon purchases or that it deserves any share of the mutually beneficial exchange between you and your dry wall guy.

Increasingly we’re all in business and in personal life thinking of more and more ways to game a system which we have less and less faith in.

It’s not civil disobedience that I’m talking about. It’s the opposite: Civil disobedience is meant to be noticed. It is a price paid in the hope of creating social change. 

What I’m talking about is not based on hope; in fact, it has given up much hope on social change. It thinks the government is a colossal amoeba twitching mindlessly in response to tiny pinpricks of pain from an endless army of micro-brained interest groups. The point is not to teach the amoeba nor to guide it, but simply to stay away from the lethal stupidity of its pseudopods.

The amoeba does not get smarter but it does get hungrier and bigger. On the other hand, we get smarter. More and more of our life takes place outside of the amoeba’s reach: in the privacy of our own homes, in capital accounts in other nations, or in the fastest growing amoeba avoidance zone ever created, cyberspace. We revolt decision by decision, transaction by transaction, because we believe deep down that most of what government tells us to do is, at bottom, illegitimate.

Article originally published on

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Obama’s LGBT Executive Order undermines pluralism and religious liberty
Daily Caller – Ryan T. Anderson – 7/21/2014

Today President Barack Obama issued an executive order barring federal contractors from what it describes as “discrimination” on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Employers should respect the intrinsic dignity of all of their employees, but today’s executive order undermines our nation’s commitment to pluralism and religious liberty.

Today’s executive order does not contain any religious liberty protections—though it does retain an older federal regulation that permits religious organizations that favor employment of co-religionists to continue such practices. But there is no protection for organizations that hire based on mission—not on affiliation—to continue to do so. This in effect excludes taxpayers who hold conscientious beliefs about sexuality that run counter to Obama’s from being eligible for federal contracts funded with their own tax dollars.

Federal policy on government contracts should not seek to enforce monolithic liberal secularism. Today’s order undermines our nation’s commitment to reasonable pluralism and reasonable diversity. All citizens and the groups they form should be free to exist and participate in relevant government programs according to their reasonable beliefs. The federal government should not use the tax-code and government contracting to reshape civil society on controversial moral issues that have nothing to do with the federal contract at stake.

All educational institutes, for example, that meet bona fide requirements about education (not sexuality) should be eligible for federal contracts if they fulfill the federal purpose of the program—education.

Today’s order disregards the consciences and liberties of people of goodwill who happen not to share the government’s opinions about issues of sexuality.

Previous guidelines for federal contractors prohibited discrimination on race, color, national origin, sex, and religious affiliation. These protections make sense, because race, color, national origin and sex are rarely—if ever—relevant to job performance, while religious affiliation is relevant for some religious organizations (and, as noted above, there were religious hiring exemptions). But sexual orientation and gender identity are not like race.

Indeed, sexual orientation and gender identity are unclear, ambiguous terms. They can refer to voluntary behaviors as well as thoughts and inclinations, and it is reasonable for employers to make distinctions based on actions.

By contrast, “race” and “sex” clearly refer to traits, and in the overwhelming majority of cases, these traits (unlike voluntary behaviors) do not affect fitness for any job.

Worst of all, today’s executive order is unnecessary. Voluntary market forces are already eliminating true discrimination, as making employment decisions based on non-relevant factors hurts one’s ability to compete. Indeed, the liberal Williams Institute at UCLA, which conducts research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy, reports that most federal contractors do not consider sexuality:

• As of May 2014, 86 percent of the top 50 federal contractors prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation, and 61 percent prohibited discrimination based on gender identity.
• All but two (96 percent) of the top 50 Fortune 500 companies prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation as of May 2014, and 70 percent prohibited discrimination based on gender identity.

But the federal government should not penalize those contractors that do conscientiously judge sexual orientation or gender identity to be relevant to their mission and purpose.

In response to this executive order, Congress has an opportunity to protect religious liberty and the rights of conscience. Policy should prohibit the government from discriminating against any individual or group, whether nonprofit or for-profit, based on their beliefs that marriage is the union of a man and woman or that sexual relations are reserved for marriage. The government should be prohibited from discriminating against such groups or individuals in tax policy, employment, licensing, accreditation, or contracting.

The Marriage and Religious Freedom Act—sponsored by Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, in the House (H.R. 3133) with more than 100 co-sponsors of both parties and sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee, R – Utah, in the Senate (S. 1808) with 17 co-sponsors—would prevent the federal government from taking such adverse actions. Protecting religious liberty and the rights of conscience fosters a more diverse civil sphere. Indeed, tolerance is essential to promoting peaceful coexistence even amid disagreement.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country


Those who oppose Homosexuality should be ‘ruthlessly’ stamped out
Godfather Politics – Gary DeMar – 7/25/2014

It’s shocking how 1.6 percent of the population – I’m speaking of LGBTers – are controlling our culture. Years ago they told us over and over again that a person’s choice in sex partners shouldn’t matter.

Now it seems that’s all that matters. Michael Sam feels compelled to tell the world that he has sex with other men, and he and his fellow-LGBTers demand that we accept his choice in sex partners or else.

It’s gotten so bad that a person can’t express an opinion on the subject without being assaulted through numerous media channels.

Keep in mind that where a man sticks his pxxxx is is not the same as being born with black skin. There are all types of sexual behaviors that are considered abnormal and criminal. Some people have positive opinions about them and most have negative opinions. Once immoral and irrational sexual behavior like same-sex sexuality has been “defined down,” other sexual taboos have fallen with it.

It’s already happening with pedophilia, polyandry, incest, and polygamy.
How many times have you heard LGBTers argue that love should not be forbidden? I don’t know anybody who wants to forbid or outlaw love. . . . the LBGT issue isn’t about love; it’s about legitimizing certain types of sexual behaviors, relationships, and transitions (transgenders).

Any contrary opinion can lead to dire legal complications.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Friday, July 25, 2014


WI GOP Lawmakers:  Don’t bring undocumented children to state
Watch Dog – Adam Tobias – 7/25/2014

MADISON, Wis. — Republican State Rep. David Craig is worried about the potential for a public health crisis coming to Wisconsin.

NOT IN WISCONSIN: State Rep. David Craig and three other Republican state lawmakers have asked the federal government not to bring undocumented children to Wisconsin.

That’s one of the reasons he and three other state GOP lawmakers wrote a letter Thursday asking the Department of Homeland Security to withdraw its request for Wisconsin to shelter hundreds of undocumented children who have crossed the Mexican border illegally.

“What are we bringing into our state when we have so many diseases internationally that used to be dormant and are now on the resurgence with some strain?” Craig, R-Vernon, told Wisconsin Reporter on Friday. “Is the federal government going through any review whatsoever of the health condition of the children, given the sheer volume of children that we are talking about?”

But the health implications are unclear to some parties because the federal government is “neglecting its obligation to uphold the law while failing to provide adequate information to state officials,” according to the letter, which was also penned by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Burlington; and state Reps. Joel Kleefisch, R-Oconomowoc, and John Nygren, R-Marinette.

Craig said interaction between the feds and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services and the state Department of Children and Families has been minimal.

“From what we can tell, the relationship between the federal authorities and the state authorities is basically nothing,” Craig told Wisconsin Reporter. “So, the federal government is being very secretive about all of these things.”

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Thursday, July 24, 2014


The stealing of America by Cops, Courts, Corporations and Congress
Freedom Outpost – John Whitehead – 7/24/2014

"What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It's not good at much else." —Author Tom Clancy
Call it what you will—taxes, penalties, fees, fines, regulations, tariffs, tickets, permits, surcharges, tolls, asset forfeitures, foreclosures, etc.—but the only word that truly describes the constant bilking of the American taxpayer by the government and its corporate partners is theft.

We're operating in a topsy-turvy Sherwood Forest where instead of Robin Hood and his merry band of thieves stealing from the rich to feed the poor, you've got the government and its merry band of corporate thieves stealing from the poor to fatten the wallets of the rich. In this way, the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. All the while, the American Dream of peace, prosperity, and liberty has turned into a nightmare of endless wars, debilitating debt, and outright tyranny.

What Americans don't seem to comprehend is that if the government can arbitrarily take away your property, without your having much say about it, you have no true rights. You're nothing more than a serf or a slave.

In this way, the police state with all of its trappings—from surveillance cameras, militarized police, SWAT team raids, truancy and zero tolerance policies, asset forfeiture laws, privatized prisons and red light cameras to Sting Ray guns, fusion centers, drones, black boxes, hollow-point bullets, detention centers, speed traps and abundance of laws criminalizing otherwise legitimate conduct—is little more than a front for a high-dollar covert operation aimed at laundering as much money as possible through government agencies and into the bank accounts of corporations.

The rationalizations for the American police state are many. There's the so-called threat of terrorism, the ongoing Drug War, the influx of illegal immigrants, the threat of civil unrest in the face of economic collapse, etc. However, these rationalizations are merely excuses for the growth of a government behemoth, one which works hand in hand with corporations to profit from a society kept under lockdown and in fear at all times. 

Indeed, as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, the real motivating factor behind erecting a police state is not to protect the people, but to further enrich the powerful.

In sum, the American police state is a multi-billion dollar boondoggle, meant to keep the property and the resources of the American people flowing into corrupt government agencies and their corporate partners. For those with any accounting ability, it's clear that the total sum of the expenses being charged to the American taxpayer's account by the government add up to only one thing: the loss of our freedoms. It's time to seriously consider a plan to begin de-funding this beast and keeping our resources where they belong: in our communities, working for us.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Wednesday, July 23, 2014


Illegal Immigration and Gangs:  Someday our cities will burn because we didn’t protect our borders
Freedom Outpost – Michael Snyder – 7/23/2014

Did you know that the number of illegal immigrants that enter Texas each week is greater than the number of babies being born to citizens of that state? The mainstream media is shining the spotlight very brightly on all of the children that are coming over, and there is a reason for that. They are trying to tug on our heartstrings. But there is another part of the story that you aren't hearing much about. By refusing to protect our borders, Barack Obama has allowed hundreds of thousands of gang members to illegally enter the United States and settle in our major cities. In many communities, gang activity is already wildly out of control, and someday our cities will burn because of the foolishness of the federal government.

According to Texas state Senator Dan Patrick, illegal immigrants have been formally charged with nearly half a million crimes in his state over the past four years alone. And he also says that there are "at least 100,000 illegal immigrant gang members" living in his state right now...

Overall, there are now approximately 1.4 million gang members living in the United States according to the FBI. But that number is actually a few years old now, so the true number is undoubtedly far higher at this point.

“The National Border Patrol Council believes there to be serious security issues at the Nogales Processing Center. Agents’ hands are tied due to the policies governing the care and lodging of juveniles and this has allowed gang recruitment and activity to flourish among those being detained,” vice president of the National Border Patrol Council Shawn Moran tells Townhall. “Customs and Border Protection needs to do more to ensure that gang members that are in custody at the NPC are identified, prosecuted, and prohibited from benefiting from this crisis.”

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

American Family Association - 7I/22/2014

Obama gives special protections for homosexuals, bisexuals and transsexuals, but takes away religious freedoms from Christians

On July 21, President Barack Obama delivered on his promise to expand special rights and privileges to homosexuals, and at the same time, specifically rejected repeated calls to include religious liberty exemptions for Christian-owned businesses.

His executive order is an immediate response to the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Hobby Lobby decision and the failure of Senate Majority leader Harry Reid's attempt last week to punish companies like Hobby Lobby, which practice their Christian faith in their business.

Defying the Constitution, which gives only Congress the authority to make laws, President Obama decreed that anyone who does business with the federal government must adopt written policies that specifically mandate special protections for "sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin." See OneNewsNow story here.

Obama's love affair with homosexuality will impact some 24,000 companies with 28 million workers, or one-fifth of the U.S. workforce. More alarming, his order discriminates against Christians.

What this means to you:

In most cases, the government uses private and locally-owned civilian businesses to provide services. Examples include construction companies (carpenters, plumbers, electricians, etc.), health care professions, retail vendors (Walmart, Menard's, restaurant chains), hotels and airlines.

Without an exemption, Obama is ordering Christians to embrace sin and forfeit their faith convictions if they want to have the same business opportunities as non-Christian businesses.

Obama has overstepped his authority and treats Christians as second-class citizens.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country