Saturday, January 4, 2014

OBAMA'S PROGRESSIVE DICTATORSHIP



As we observe that tragedy of a tyrannical President fighting with an unequivocally worthless Congress over the Budget, Debt Ceiling, and ObamaCare disaster, we realize that this bunch of Washington politicians are really the result of our government’s devolution into a single progressive party system, totally oblivious to the needs and desires of the American people. It’s immaterial whether you refer to them as Democans or Republicrats; a vast majority of them are evil, self serving politicians bent on one fundamental purpose: keep the status-quo and keep their cushy membership in the ruling elite class. The mere mentioning of the ideas of congressional term limits, tax reform, federal budget limits, or debt limits evokes an instant condemnation and political assassination of any upstart member of either the House or the Senate who dares to advocate such measures. 

It is time to abolish the ill-evolved concept of “career politician.”
 
In this past year, 2013, we celebrated the 100th anniversary of the three most devastating governmental attacks on the future and freedoms of our country: 

§       The Federal Reserve Act
§       The 16th Amendment Legalizes the Internal Revenue Service
§       The 17th Amendment, robbing the States of control of the Senate and Protection from Federal Government Tyranny

These things happened while the ultimately progressive President, Woodrow Wilson was in office and he got there by virtue of Theodore Roosevelt’s failed Progressive Party (Bull Moose) campaign of 1912. The Roosevelt “Bull Moose” candidacy split the Republican vote and insured Wilson’s victory over incumbent President William Howard Taft.

As Judge Andrew Napolitano rightly points out in his book, “Theodore and Woodrow,” Roosevelt and Wilson were two progressive American Presidents who destroyed constitutional freedom. They were sometimes labeled otherwise but both were true big and powerful Federal Government advocates. They worked together to guide our country into today’s era of overarching government control, a political philosophy which both parties have consistently followed, concluding with both the Bush and Obama administrations.

Our founding fathers started out with a two party system: the Federalists led by George Washington, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton who believed in an all-powerful large Federal Government and the Democratic-Republicans notably led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison who believed in a power-limited Federal Government.

After the War of 1812 the Federalists died off and the Democratic-Republicans soon split into the Democrat and Whig parties. By the 1850’s the Whigs were replaced by the Republican Party and Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican president.  

At the turn of the century big government progressivism was in full bloom in both parties and the Republican establishment decided they could best suppress the exuberantly progressive views of Teddy Roosevelt by installing him in that powerless “do nothing” position of Vice President of the U.S. That ploy failed miserably when President McKinley was assassinated in 1901 and Teddy became our 26th president.

A true progressive, Roosevelt (inappropriately labeled Republican) pushed his progressive ideas through 1909 at which time he personally picked William Howard Taft to succeed him in implementing his progressive agenda. Taft turned out to be a huge disappointment in his conservative views and Teddy changed his mind about running for a third term and, with the help of banker J.P. Morgan, ran for another term as a correctly labeled Progressive. This turned out to be a perfectly executed plan to split the vote between Taft and Roosevelt and give the presidency to Woodrow Wilson who had promised J.P. Morgan that he would breathe life into that “Creature From Jekyll Island” (originally spawned in 1910) by passing the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

This legitimized the happenings on Jekyll Island where the most powerful financiers in the world (representing 25% of the wealth on the planet) conspired to illegally restrain world trade to their monetary advantage by the establishment of a banking cartel to control banking throughout the world. Their goal was to establish the method of creating money “out-of-nothing” when needed and assure that inevitable losses are paid for by the taxpayers.

They were eminently successful and provided Progressives a powerful controlling tool utilized to this day.

In order to accomplish the Progressive’s goal of massive Federal Government expansion to control every aspect of its citizen’s lives, the lack of money was a monumental impediment. The obvious simple solution: institute an income tax which would result in the taxpayers paying for the “BIG” government. Thus the second important part of the Progressive Revolution of 1913 was the passage of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, The Federal Income Tax.

Judge Napolitano commented:

“The passage of the 16th Amendment . . . signified Americans handing over the freedoms earned by the blood of their forefathers and entrenching themselves into a slavery contrary to the very essence of our nation’s beginning.”

Another irritating constraint to the Progressive’s goal for absolute government control was the inconvenience of the Constitutional mandate of continued Federalism by the State government’s control of Senate appointments. Both Roosevelt and Wilson advocated the direct election of the senators as a means of furthering the power of the federal government and a strong campaign by the Progressives in 1913 ended in the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment prevents the states from protection from the Federal Government encroaching on their sovereignty.

Woodrow Wilson summarized his view and the view of all progressives since:

“While we are followers of Jefferson, there is one principle of Jefferson’s which no longer can obtain in the practical politics of America. You know that it was Jefferson who said that the best government is that which does as little governing as possible . . . . But that time has passed. America is not now and cannot in the future be a place for unrestricted individual enterprise.”

Wilson’s view regarding the Constitution was that it should be thought of as a “Darwinian” rather than a “Newtonian” document and thus should evolve with changing times. The Wilson idea on leadership is summarized by his view that a true leader should command the subservience of the masses by stirring up their passions, not their intellects.

The Progressive Revolution of 1913 set the stage for the eventual devolution to the single party dictatorship which exists today. The evils of progressivism were temporarily inhibited by President Calvin Coolidge during the 20’s, but re-exploded in the 30’s and 40’s under the tutelage of that supreme progressive, Franklin D. Roosevelt. With the exception of the Coolidge and Reagan perturbations, Abraham Lincoln’s Republican Party of the 1850’s is officially dead.

The ingrained progressivism of the Democratic Party (as firmly established by FDR and Truman) did suffer its own aberration of conservative thought in the name of John F. Kennedy. By any reasonable definition, he was a conservative.

On July 4th, 1946 John F. Kennedy, a 29 year old Lieutenant in the Navy Reserve and veteran of the war in the Pacific, gave the keynote speech at Faneuil Hall in Boston which exemplifies his political and governing philosophy. He began with a discussion about the profoundly religious contribution to the shaping of American history. He said:

“Throughout the years, down to the present, a devotion to fundamental religious principles has characterized American thought and action.”

He continued on to discuss the importance of the Declaration of Independence, the First Amendment to the Constitution, and quoted both President Washington and President Lincoln regarding the indispensable requirement for religion and morality in governing our nation. He said further:

“The American character .  .  .  has been essentially individual. The right of the individual against the State has ever been one of our most cherished political principles. The American Constitution has set down for all men .  .  . that there are certain rights held by every man which no government and no majority, however powerful, can deny.”   

Today's Hijacked Marxist Democratic Party — the home of Barack Obama, John Kerry, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi — would instantly politically assassinate a candidate like JFK, a conservative champion of economic growth, tax cuts, limited government, and peace through strength.

Unfortunately that miniscule flame of conservatism and common sense in the Democratic Party was brutally extinguished by Lee Harvey Oswald in 1963 leading to President Lyndon Johnson’s willfully steering the nation onto the course of massive government intervention into the day-to-day lives of all Americans, and unfettered social spending. Thus the inexorable transfer of unbridled power to Washington and the political expedient of unsustainable promises to the American people had begun, totally uninhibited. 

Norman Thomas, six-time U.S. presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America, Gus Hall, four-time U.S. presidential candidate for the U.S. Communist Party, and Frank Marshall Davis, Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member and mentor to a young Barack Obama all contributed to today’s transformed Democratic Party. In my October 2012 article entitled “The Hijacking of the Democratic Party” I remarked that I voted for JFK in 1960 but “the Democratic Party of 1960 has ceased to exist.”

The last vestige of Jeffersonian limited government conservatism died with Ronald Reagan and Progressivism reigned supreme in both the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections.

Our evil dictator, Obama couldn’t be more thrilled about the apparent rift in the Republican Party. His hope is that the Tea Party will be the equivalent resurrection of 1912’s “Bull Moose” effect and give the 2014 and 2016 elections to the Democrat progressives for the completion of the destruction of the United States.

Obama’s recent employment of this “Bull Moose” strategy worked perfectly for him as he paid for a “fake” libertarian’s candidacy to split the Republican vote for Virginia’s Governorship and gave it to the extremely progressive candidate. The Republican establishment progressives helped out by purposely “dumping” the Tea Party candidate as part of a nationwide plan to destroy the Tea Party in favor of retaining the Republican Party as a progressive clone of the Democratic party.

If we allow the Republican progressives to kill the Tea Party and suppress Libertarian thought, the single party dictatorship is permanently enshrined. It is excruciatingly obvious that a 3rd party revival by the Tea Party would simply be a stupid repetition of the “Bull Moose” experiment of 1912. Peter Schweizer, author of “Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes, and Line Their Own Pockets” described this ridiculous infighting between Marxist Progressive Democrats and Progressive Establishment Republicans as being analogous to the staged battles in professional wrestling.  They growl at each other, and perform controlled, fake nasty attacks on each other, but in reality it’s all about the MONEY and retention of the status-quo!

One of our last hopes is a move similar to the 1850’s when the Lincoln Republicans replaced the Whig Party. We desperately need a Tea Party/Libertarian movement to suppress the leadership of the Republican establishment progressives and form a new enlightened conservative version of the Republican Party. The Progressive dictatorship that we now suffer under has no relationship to the interests and desires of the majority of America’s citizens; it is the natural response to the single loudest group of people with a unified direction and large enough to enforce its views.

Friedrich Hayek in his monumental “Road to Serfdom” points out that such a group will always be formed by the worst elements of any society. A high level of education and intelligence of individuals will always counter the formation of such a group.

Hayek says:

“.  .  .  we have to descend to the regions of lower moral and intellectual standards where the more primitive and common instincts and tastes prevail.”

“It will be those whose vague and imperfectly formed ideas are easily swayed and whose passions and emotions are readily aroused who will thus swell the ranks of the totalitarian party.”

TRUTHFUL EDUCATION AT ALL LEVELS IS THE ULTIMATE ANSWER!
Written by Chuck Boyde

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

PRISONERS COLLECTING UNEMPLOYEMENT BENEFITS



Prison with benefits: WI inmates collect $600,000 in unemployment
Wisconsin Reporter – M. D. Kittle – 7/11/2013

MADISON — Who says you can’t collect unemployment in prison?

The law.

But that didn’t stop hundreds of inmates from cashing in on hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal unemployment payments, according to information obtained by Wisconsin Reporter through an open records request.

There were 593 cases of “overpayments,” or jobless benefits paid in the names of Wisconsin prisoners between July 2012 and this month — to the tune of $616,248, according to state Department of Workforce Development records.

Crime Pays? 593 inmates collected a total of $616,000 in unemployment benefits over the last year, according to the Department of Workforce Development.

That’s more than double the amount uncovered in an audit in 2011, which found the Unemployment Insurance Division paid out $291,248 to inmates, according to DWD spokesman John Dipko.

Data obtained by Wisconsin Reporter in July 2012 found 406 inmates scammed unemployment benefits from July 2011 to July 2012.

Dipko said the numbers are rising because of collaboration between agencies in targeting fraud.

“We believe the primary reason is we are getting better at tracking down cases through our aggressive approach, stronger relationships with correctional officials, and more effective use of the tools at our disposal to track down cases,” he said in a follow-up email to Wisconsin Reporter.

Dipko added that the latest numbers also may cover a slightly longer period.

Unemployment compensation programs are administered by the states and funded by payroll taxes that employers pay.

The Unemployment Insurance Division uses an inmate cross match system initiated in 2011 to match records with Social Security Administration records for incarceration.

“The monthly run helps identify individuals who were collecting UI (Unemployment Insurance) benefits while incarcerated,” Dipko said. “While the information obtained via this cross match is about three months old, it provides the opportunity for recovery of benefits that were wrongfully claimed.”
Dipko said DWD receives alerts from officials who become aware of inmates receiving UI benefits. It’s part of an ongoing approach that includes “actively monitoring” media reports of criminal activity to determine whether the subjects are filing for unemployment benefits and, if so, “immediately suspending payments and investigating.”

But the system isn’t fraud proof.

Gov. Scott Walker recently signed into law Act 36, which is supposed to strengthen the Unemployment Insurance Division’s ability to hold all UI claimants accountable for sharing their PIN information in fraud cases. Unemployment officials say much of the fraud is committed when a family member or friend reports an unemployment claim on behalf of the convict. Pocketing unemployment on behalf of an inmate is a legal no-no.

“Should an inmate share his or her PIN with a spouse, significant other, mother or other family member or friend while incarcerated and fraud occurs, we will be able to hold the inmate responsible for the overpayment,” Dipko said of the new law. “That is a change from current law and should continue to support our fraud detection and recovery efforts.”

The Unemployment Insurance Division also has added 10 investigators, compared to one under Gov. Jim Doyle’s administration, to “aggressively pursue and recover overpayments and fraudulent claims,” Dipko said.

With more resources and sharper teeth in laws devoted to going after unemployment fraud, it begs the question: Was there more fraud out there that had gone undetected? Is there more fraud than is being reported? The answer appears to be, probably.

Dipko could not provide recovery figures for unemployment benefits paid to inmates, but he noted the Unemployment Insurance Bureau of Tax and Accounting collected more than $25.2 million in fraudulent overpayments  and more than $24.9 million in non-fraud overpayments (mistakes made by UI or glitches in the system) in 2012.

The UI division attempts to recover fraud and other overpayments through levies, warrants and tax-refund intercepts.

There are instances in which inmates could be eligible for unemployment benefits. Inmates held at county jails for a short time such as 48-hour holds, or who are permitted to leave jail and look for work and are considered able and available to work, could legally be eligible for Unemployment Insurance, if they are unemployed, Dipko said.

State Rep. Samantha Kerkman, R-Randall, co-chair of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, said the increased level of overpayments to inmates underscores the importance of agencies cross-checking beneficiaries of public assistance programs.

“I think this is a great start but we can always be more vigilant,” she said, noting proposed legislation and calls for bills to boost cross-referencing. “This is critical in saving taxpayers money.”

Contact M.D. Kittle at mkittle@wisconsinreporter.com
Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

COMMON CORE: OPEN LETTER TO WISCONSIN LEGISLATORS



Are you opposed to Common Core teaching in Wisconsin’s public schools or not?  If you are opposed, please read the following and respond to Karen Schroeder (see below for her e-mail and the information she needs from you).

FEEL FREE TO FORWARD TO YOUR E-MAIL LIST

Dear Friends Fighting Common Core in Wisconsin:

Our legislators have proposed bills that will replace Common Core Standards several years from now. This is not acceptable. We need your help to encourage legislators to eliminate Common Core Standards and all federally aligned curriculum and tests from Wisconsin schools NOW!  If you are willing to help by signing the letter that follows this message, PLEASE RESPOND BY JANUARY 4, 2013! and send permission to include your name to:  


INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING WITH YOUR PERMISSION:  (1)  Your first and last name.  (2)  How you would like to be identified (concerned taxpayer, teacher of Middle Town School, President of The Best Company in Wisconsin, Parent of three school age children, etc.) and (3) Your city and zip code.   ALL SIGNATORIES MUST LIVE IN WISCONSIN.

Once signatures are gathered, each legislator and the Governor will receive a hand-delivered copy of the letter listing all those who sign on to this letter. The more signatures we have, the better. Encourage friends and family to participate and to help bring an end to Common Core in Wisconsin.

LETTER TO GOVERNOR WALKER AND TO THE STATE LEGISLATORS:

Dear (Legislators):

We the undersigned request that Common Core Standards and all federally aligned curricula and testing be removed from Wisconsin’s educational systems NOW!   State legislators are responsible for providing the front-line of defense against federal intrusion into state autonomy of education. Please correct mistakes made when Wisconsin legislators passed funding and other pieces of legislation that supported the implementation of Common Core Standards and the federally aligned curricula and testing.

Historically, the longer a federal program has been ingrained into the educational system, the more difficult it becomes to remove the initiative. Once the testing begins in 2014-2015, Common Core will be fully implemented. Testing drives all curricula. Thus, it is essential that all federally funded and supported standards, curricula, and testing be removed NOW! 

Wisconsinites want our own set of standards.  That will only happen when legislators remove the roadblocks they created which limit the effective implementation of local control of schools.

Many of the undersigned have tried to meet with school board members to discuss Common Core. When school leadership believes that funding is dependent upon the implementation of Common Core, school boards often place walls in the paths of citizens and other board members who wish to exercise local control. Wisconsin’s legislators created this problem through funding bills that provide money for the implementation of specific aspects of Common Core; therefore, legislators are responsible for correcting this problem immediately.

Under local control of schools, the state Department of Public Instruction has the responsibility to develop a baseline set of standards that each school district may enrich. Given the dissatisfaction with the current Wisconsin standards, legislators have the authority to demand that the DPI find a replacement set of standards that schools may adopt immediately so textbooks can be purchased this summer and the curriculum and testing can be implemented in the fall of the 2014-2015 school year. 

Legislative bodies have the right to inform the DPI that the Massachusetts English and math standards have allowed Massachusetts’ students to excel in English and math for many years. The legislators have a right to inform the DPI that the people of Wisconsin have consistently shown support for the Massachusetts standards. They also have the right to encourage the DPI to develop baseline standards for Wisconsin by using Massachusetts standards as a guideline.

We are pleased with the two pieces of proposed legislation that limit the sharing of student data and provide protections from biometric data collection:  LRB-3694/C and LRB-3165-R.

Please include language that requires the state and local schools to provide parents with accurate, complete, yet, simply stated descriptions of any mechanical devices that may be used in the testing, a list of the types of information the district intends to gather, the intended use of that information by educators, and a list of persons or organizations that will have access to the data once collected. Thank you for requiring parents to opt-in before any state or federally aligned biometric testing can occur.

Respectfully,

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

FEDERAL JUDGE STRIKES DOWN AMENDMENT IN UTAH



Utah’s lesson for the other 33 pro-marriage states
Daily Caller - Bruce Parker – 12/30/2013

On December 20, on the eve of the nation’s Christmas break, an Obama-appointed federal judge launched a one-man coup against the state of Utah by unilaterally striking down the state’s constitutional marriage amendment — a law passed democratically by two-thirds of Utahans and shared in common with 33 other states.

In a 53-page ruling, which could best be described as a work of judicial fiction, District Court Judge Robert J. Shelby began by conceding that marriage law is “the province of the states,” but he proceeded to void Utah’s marriage law in a naked power grab that he admitted was not within his purview to do.
By the end of the ruling, Judge Shelby had overturned Utah’s definition of marriage by

In the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Whenever the federal government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void and of no force.”

Alexander Hamilton warned that “acts of the federal government which are not pursuant to its constitutional powers … will be merely acts of usurpation, and will deserve to be treated as such.”


TRANSLATION FOR UTAH AND OTHER PRO-MARRIAGE STATES: DISMISS ILLEGITIMATE FEDERAL RULINGS AND CONTINUE LAWFUL ENFORCEMENT OF STATE MARRIAGE LAWS.



ARE DEMOCRATS RACISTS?????



Critical Projection Theory – who’s the racist?
Freedom Outpost – David Risselada – 12/22/2013

Liberal professors and the social sciences are going to great lengths to ensure that certain social groups continue to blame other social groups for their social ills, and it is has become institutionalized through theories like “critical race theory.”

It’s funny, because one of the tenets about critical race theory proposes that America uses its institutions and economic system to keep minorities oppressed. At the same time, it goes on to argue that those that fail to see the consequences, or the results of America’s so called racist past on today’s blacks are themselves racist. In other words, believing that black America could have overcome the evils of colonial imperialism in a society where not one white person is guilty of slavery makes one a racist bigot.

In an effort to try to give the black community a hand up, white guilt laden liberals have come up with programs of all sorts to make up for the perceived social inequalities. One such program is AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. However, I believe it has dire consequences because it is reinforcing an entitlement mentality rather than actually putting blacks on an equal footing. If a man believes he does not have to try as hard to get where he wants to be, then why would he?

What affirmative action is actually telling the black community is that the people that devolved the program don’t believe that they are as capable of achieving success in this society as other social groups. This is evident by the different standards set for different minority groups.

The standards for blacks are generally set very low in affirmative action programs. More can be read on this issue here.

If lowering standards have the effect of developing an entitlement mentality, and the entitlement mentality is what is leading to poverty and dependence on government welfare than wouldn’t it be the liberal social scientists and higher education that is the institutional racism that critical race theory proponents insist exists in American society today? I believe it is, and I am going to call this Critical Projection Theory.

Why critical projection theory? A couple of different reasons, one it’s my way of using the Alinsky based strategy of using your opponents rules against them. In this case, the word “critical,” which the left uses in virtually every context they can, in order to get young, uninformed kids to think critically of their culture, is being used to get people to think critically of who stands to benefit in an America where racial tensions are high. It is also meant to identify who is really responsible for these racial tensions.

Secondly, I believe the word “projection” is very accurate, as it seems those on the left are desperate to keep racial tensions alive as a right wing issue because they know in reality it is their history of racism and the failed social programs they initiated that are the true cause of the black man’s perils today.

Historically speaking, it has been the democrats who have been responsible for the oppression of blacks in America.

They are responsible for the Jim Crow segregation laws and the Great Society programs that have decimated the black family and left them dependent on government assistance.

The failures of the affirmative action, entitlement mentality, are reaching critical mass in America today. We live in a world where academia and bureaucratic institutions, in an effort to conceal the truth are lying to society with what I call “White Privilege Education.”

White people in America are privileged because we live in a society that only benefits us, and we knowingly or not, contribute to the oppression of minorities.  How could this kind of education not lead to racial tension? Essentially you have one class of people being taught, by liberal race hustlers mind you, that they are being oppressed by another class of people.  

According to Saul Alinsky and other radical, leftist’s revolutionaries, this is the one ingredient needed to ensure a social revolution. 

My intentions are to show the real injustice being served to black America as the left continues to make excuses for behavior that can be explained as being a result of misguided social policies that only hurt them instead of helped them. They have been taught that they are owed and, as a result, they have failed to put their best foot forward and the result has been increased poverty and a settling for low academic achievement.

In the meantime, the left virtually ignores the facts and continues to blame a system that they despise in order to justify the continuation of failed social programs at your expense. Not only are these programs not producing any results, they are also producing people who are becoming increasingly hostile to those who simply believe they are just as capable as pulling themselves up as anyone else. All of this is based on lies to keep the votes secure, keep the welfare dollars flowing and to hide the truth of the democrat’s racist past.

Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

DEMOCRATIC HISTORICAL OPPOSITION TO CIVIL RIGHTS


Examining the Democrat party using critical projection theory
Freedom Outpost – David Risselada – 12/23/2013

Below is a chronological record of the history of civil rights and the Democrats opposition to it.
  • 1854- Republican Party formed to stop the spread of slavery.
  • 1854-Stephen Douglas, head of the Democrat Party authored the Kansas Nebraska Act. To win southern support, Douglas promised a southern state that would support slavery. Republicans overwhelmingly opposed this bill.
  • 1861- Majority of Democrat controlled States threaten secession form union due to Election of Republican President Abraham Lincoln, who opposed slavery.
  • 1863-Abraham Lincoln issues Emancipation Proclamation while Democrat Party still supports slavery.
  • 1865- The thirteenth amendment passed a Republican controlled congress with 100% support from Republicans and only 23% from Democrats. This amendment abolished the institution of slavery.
  • 1866-Republican Party passes the first Civil Rights legislation protecting the rights of freed slaves.
  • 1868-Republicans pass and ratify the fourteenth amendment, which guarantees blacks the rights due all American citizens. Republican support, 94% Democrat support, 0%
  • 1870-Republicans pass fifteenth amendment, recognizing the right of freed slaves to vote. 100% Republican support -0% Democrat support.
  • 1871-Republican Party passes civil rights act, or the anti KKK bill which was the enforcement of the Democrat Party.
  • 1875-The nation’s first anti-discriminatory legislation is enacted with 99% Republican support and 0% Democrat support.
  • 1915- Woodrow Wilson (D) Americas first official progressive president, initiates laws which undo 50 years of integration by segregating the federal government and the U.S. military.
  • 1922- Republican Leonidas Dyer passes the first anti-lynching law in the House of Representatives. Out of 119 members voting against the measure, 103 were Democrats.
  • 1957- The Democrat Party filibuster the first civil rights legislation to be introduced in 82 years. This legislation was introduced by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower and supported by 92% of Republicans and only 54% of Democrats.
  • 1960- The Democrats once again filibuster civil rights legislation introduced by Dwight Eisenhower.
  • 1964- Civil rights legislation passes due to the efforts of Republican minority leader Everette M. Dirksen. Republican support 80% Democrat support 63%. What makes the passage of this civil rights legislation significant, is the fact that Lyndon Johnson, after leading the efforts as Senate majority leader to filibuster, when introduced by Eisenhower, claims it as his own, as president, for the purpose of stealing the votes of black Americans. To quote Democratic President Lyndon Johnson-”I’ll have those n**gers voting democratic for the next 200 years.”
That last quote from President Lyndon Johnson is pretty telling. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO HIS PLANS FOR THE “GREAT SOCIETY” WHICH IS NOTHING OTHER THAN A HUGE WELFARE STATE THAT ENSURED BLACK AMERICANS WOULD REMAIN FOREVER DEPENDENT ON GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS. THIS IS HOW WE HAVE REACHED A POINT WHERE BELIEVING BLACKS CAN ACHIEVE SOMETHING ON THEIR OWN MERITS IS NOW VIEWED AS RACIST BECAUSE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS TRYING TO HIDE THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR RACIST PAST AND THEIR AGENDA TO TURN THE WHOLE NATION INTO A GIANT WELFARE STATE THE LIKES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.

In an earlier article, I referred to this as Critical Projection Theory. 


Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN BASICS SYSTEM OF LAW



Back to the Basics:
Straightening Up America, VIII
By Virginia Armstrong, Ph.D., National Chairman
Throughout this year of 2013, we have been responding to a question that is central to America’s current chaos and future condition: “How far can you make a man bend over backwards before he breaks?” This anguished cry was heard in one of the most widely acclaimed musical productions of the Twentieth Century, “Fiddler on the Roof.” And it is the thought with which we have begun our latest Court Watch Briefings. We are asking, Has America bent over backwards too far in its spiritual, moral, and constitutional life — too far from our Constitution and its Judeo-Christian roots? Are we as a nation in sore need of “a fundamental straightening up process”? Going “back to the basics” gives us the answer.

More remains to be said on this vital subject, but we conclude this year of 2013 with a summary answer to our question. Here we consider the “Basics of the Judeo-Christian System of Law” and five truths explaining the “Benefits of this System” to society in general.

The Basics of the Judeo-Christian System of Law
  1. The ultimate reality in the universe is the infinite (omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, omnibeneficient, triune, immutable) yet personal (rational, volitional, emotional, relational, creative) God who is the Sovereign of the universe.
  2. As Sovereign, God created the universe and man. He also created, and enforces, a body of Higher Law that human beings are obligated to observe and obey. Man’s disobedience will be judged and punished by the Sovereign God.
  3. God’s Higher Law consists of absolute truths and norms. This Law is expressed in both natural law (nature and the hearts of men) and revealed law (the Bible). Revealed law is a more objective, perfect, and complete expression of God’s Law than natural law.
  4. The heart of God’s law is expressed in the Ten Commandments. Both the First and Second Tables of the Commandments embody both specific norms as well as general principles applicable to all of society and to be enforced by civil law.
  5. God created man in His image, sinless (a creature of dignity and value) yet finite (limited and contingent, incapable of functioning without help outside of himself). But man chose to disobey God (“sin”) and consequently became a creature of depravity (incapable of saving himself from His sinful nature and conduct). Because of both God’s nature and man’s nature, God established civil law as one among several coordinated societal institutions to both restrain man and to help him.
  6. The primary purposes of the institution of civil law are to maintain peace and order, punish wrongdoing, and promote right doing throughout society for the common good.
The Benefits of the Judeo-Christian System of Law
This section of our “Briefing” borrows from the work of David Barton, to whom we express our great gratitude for his pioneering leadership in revealing and reviving America’s Christian history.  Barton outlines “five distinct societal benefits” of our system of law as understood by our Founders [note: the world “religious” was understood by the Founders as denoting specifically the Christian religion].
  1. First, “Christian principles produced a civilized society.” As Daniel Webster explained:
Man is not only an intellectual but he is also a religious being, and his religious feelings and habits require cultivation.  Let the religious element in man’s nature be neglected — let him be influenced by no higher motives than low self-interest, and subjected to no stronger restraint than the limits of civil authority — and he becomes the creature of selfish passion or blind fanaticism.
  1. Furthermore, “Our specific form of government would not survive without Christian principles.” This truth is summarized by John Adams in a statement we have quoted previously: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.  It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
An expansion of this idea was expressed by U. S. House Speaker Robert Winthrop when he declared that:
Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled either by a power within them or a power without them, either by the Word of God or by the strong arm of man, either by the Bible or the bayonet.
  1. The third practical benefit for the world of Christian principles was “good citizenship.”  Benjamin Franklin made this point clear when he wrote to Thomas Paine his (Franklin’s) response to ideas expressed by Paine in his Age of Reason:
[T]hink how great a portion of mankind. . . have need of the motives of religion to restrain them from vice, to support their virtue. . . .  I would advise you therefore not to attempt unchaining the tiger, but to burn this piece before it is seen by any   other person. . . . If men are so wicked with religion what would they be if without it.
  1. A fourth general benefit of Christian principles as understood by our Founders was their “elevation of science, literature, knowledge, and national stature which the Founders believed had consistently proved had accompanied the open promotion of Christian principles.” John Witherspoon declared that “It is certain, I think, that human science and religion have kept company together and greatly assisted each other’s progress in the world [hardly supportive of today’s radical anti-Christian evolutionists!].”  And Dr. Benjamin Rush, agreed, asserting that “[T]he greatest discoveries in science have been made by Christian philosophers and . . . there is most knowledge . . . where there is the most Christianity.”
  1. Finally, “Teaching Christian principles produced a cohesive value system necessary for the successful government of a nation composed of millions of individuals from [diverse backgrounds and groups].” Public education was to be a vital instrument in inculcating throughout society these common Christina values. President George Washington as early as 1789 declared that schools were to teach the “religion, morality, and knowledge” which was “necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind.” In 1844 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “a public school must instruct in the general principles of Christianity” (Vidal v. Girard’s Executors). [In many of our previous “Briefings” we have explained and illustrated the necessity of society’s having a common core of Judeo-Christian values.]
This is only a summary of the “Basics” to which America must return if we are indeed to “straighten up” and move ahead in the Twenty-First Century to our earlier position of prosperity and pre-eminence among the nations of the world.  May God bless our efforts and find us worthy at the end of 2014 of His greatest accolade: “Well done thou good and faithful servant.”


Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country