IRS Politicization is inappropriate
in a Democratic Republic
Heritage – David Burton – 5/12/2014
As Table 9b of the 2013 IRS
Databook shows, the typical audit rate for a median-income family is
0.6 percent. Thus, tea party donors whose names were disclosed to the IRS were
subjected to an audit rate 17 times higher than other Americans.
As more and more people
believe that the tax system is
unfair and politically rigged, compliance will decline. More importantly,
even the perception of the politicization of the IRS is endangering the
confidence of the American people in the fairness and legitimacy of the federal
government. It is entirely inappropriate to use the coercive apparatus of the
state against political opponents. Neither the tax law nor any other law should
be used to suppress
peaceful political speech or political organizing.
The law, however, should be
crystal clear that politically motivated IRS enforcement actions are subject to
criminal sanctions no matter who requests or authorizes them. It is not.
Congress should broaden section 7214 to cover IRS officials or employees who
abuse their position, because politically motivated IRS enforcement action is
equally inappropriate whether the official involved in instigating it works for
the White House or the IRS.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country
No comments:
Post a Comment