http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/130741333.html
JS Online -- 9/28/2011 -- Elija Grajkowski
As a public school teacher, I've thought critically about many unfair policies concerning the teachers union. Why is the Wisconsin Education Association Council granted special access to my paychecks through the school district, when other professional groups don't have this privilege? Why should payroll clerks in school district offices do the job of collecting union dues money and then cutting and sending the union their monthly checks (all on the taxpayers' dime)?
Do other organizations get this privilege? If not, why?
I allowed the union access to my paychecks so that it could turn around and tell me just how bad I had it. It's the union's job to encourage unrest, discontent and unhappiness amongst the rank and file; this is how it justifies its existence.
In my opinion, this has encouraged adversarial interactions with administrations. This is not how I want to live my life as a teacher. I wish to be thankful and grateful about what I have and realize that there are people out there paying taxes to support my position and benefits. Many Wisconsinites don't have the salary, security or benefits that I have. I'm really in no position to complain.
Now that I don't have to pay my "fair share" of union dues, I have been informing my fellow teachers about the premier non-union alternative: the Association of American Educators. AAE is not a union; it's a professional, nonprofit organization. The AAE model sees to it that I am fairly and accurately represented via its membership surveys and protected via an individual liability insurance policy and legal counsel.
AAE doesn't support partisan politics or issues unrelated to education, and its dues are a mere fraction of WEAC's. With AAE, I feel like a professional educator, not a union worker who is forced to pay excessive dues and contribute to controversial issues that don't reflect my beliefs.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Northwoods Patriots - Eagle River, WI
Friday, September 30, 2011
AGENDA 21 -- FREEDOM ADVOCATES RADIO PROGRAM -- 9/30/2011
9/30/2011 – Freedom Advocates Radio program
Agenda 21: Conspiracy Theory or Real Threat, Part II
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
PRIVATE SECTOR CREATES WEALTH
http://vcnewsreview.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5291:private-sector-creates-the-wealth&catid=28:current-users&Itemid=46
Letter to the Editor -- Vilas County News Review -- Charlie Gullan -- 9/27/2011
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Letter to the Editor -- Vilas County News Review -- Charlie Gullan -- 9/27/2011
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
LRB 2691/2 -- OPT OUT OF SMART GROWTH (AGENDA 21)
The following proposal has a short time frame.
Please read and contact your legislator to indicate your support that allows communities to Opt-Out of Smart Growth
From: Rep.WilliamsM
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:09 PM
Subject: NEW BILL - Allowing Opt-Out of Smart Growth
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:09 PM
Subject: NEW BILL - Allowing Opt-Out of Smart Growth
TO: Legislative Colleagues
FROM: Representative Tom Tiffany (and others)
DATE: September 29, 2011
DATE: September 29, 2011
RE: Co-sponsorship of LRB 2691/2 – Allowing Opt-Out of Smart Growth
SHORT DEADLINE: Friday, September 30, 2011, 3pm
Our bill does two simple things: It makes comprehensive planning optional; and it ends comprehensive planning grants. Any comprehensive planning grants that have already been awarded, however, will continue to be provided under our bill.
In 1999, the legislature passed the comprehensive planning law, also known as “Smart Growth.” Passage of this law was highly contentious, because it required all local units of government to develop comprehensive plans, which individually cost upwards of tens of thousands of dollars. State and local taxpayers have been paying for the cost of these plans ever since, through local property tax dollars and state planning grants.
The plans are so costly because of the scope of required planning. Local governments are required to include all of the following elements into their plans: Issues and Opportunities, Housing, Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities, Agricultural, Natural & Cultural Resources, Economic Development, Intergovernmental Cooperation, Land-use, and Implementation elements.
Adding to the complexity and expense of the planning process, each of these elements contain significant requirements and detailed research in terms of what must be included in the final plan. Most importantly, once the comprehensive plan is in place, nearly all of the local government’s land use ordinances must be consistent with, or in compliance with, the overall plan. In order to make certain ordinance changes, local governments will sometimes be forced to not only change their ordinances, but their comprehensive plans as well. This is a lengthy, complicated and costly process, and delays a local government’s ability to quickly respond to certain issues when necessary.
Finally, the comprehensive planning law generally requires compliance by January 1, 2010, and a delayed implementation of January 1, 2012 for the communities that received extensions. Although a majority of local governments have come into compliance, we are introducing this legislation to allow local governments to opt-out of the Smart Growth law, if they so choose. This is important for several reasons:
1) Although most communities have finished their plans, the comprehensive planning law will continue to inflict significant burdens on local governments and taxpayers into the future. These burdens are financial, legal and time consuming. The bill saves state taxpayer dollars, to the tune of $2 million annually. Future state and local taxpayer dollars will be saved as well.
2) The comprehensive planning law includes requirements that nearly everyone agrees are good for local communities. However, requiring these provisions is largely unnecessary, as many of these functions were, and will continue to be, met by locally elected officials.
3) The comprehensive planning law includes objectionable planning requirements. For example, the law requires local governments to pick winners and losers in the economy, by identifying “desired” businesses and industries and ensuring that the local government designates “an adequate number of sites for such businesses and industries.” The state will no longer be requiring these through the comprehensive planning law.
4) Finally, this bill does not repeal Smart Growth. It simply restores local control by allowing communities to opt out if they so choose. If communities opt out, they can still engage in zoning and other land use functions.
To sign on, please contact my office at 266-7506, or by responding to this email. The deadline for Co-Sponsorship is this Friday at 3pm.
Analysis by the LRB
Under the current law commonly known as the “Smart Growth” statute, if a city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission (local governmental unit) creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. The required planning elements include the following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural, natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and intergovernmental cooperation.
Also under current law, unless certain conditions apply, beginning on January 1, 2010, certain ordinances enacted or amended by a local governmental unit that affect land use must be consistent with that local governmental unit’s comprehensive plan. The ordinances to which this requirement applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances, including zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. Also under current law, beginning on January 1, 2010, if a local governmental unit enacts or amends any of these specified ordinances, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required planning elements.
Under this bill, a local governmental unit is authorized to repeal its comprehensive plan. Correspondingly, the ordinances that under current law must be consistent with a local governmental unit’s comprehensive plan must, under the bill, be consistent with the local governmental unit’s comprehensive plan only if the local governmental unit has a comprehensive plan in effect.
Under current law, the Department of Administration provides grants to local governmental units to assist in financing the cost of planning activities. This bill eliminates this grant program.
For additional information, please contact Senator Glenn Grothman’s office, Jolene Churchill, Jolene.Churchill@legis.wisconsin.gov
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Thursday, September 29, 2011
CENSUS DATA -- ONLY 1.7% OF THE POPULATION
From Family Research Council -- 9/29/2011
Back in May, a venerable Gallup poll revealed that most Americans think that over 20 percent of the population is homosexual.
Only four percent believe-correctly--that homosexuals are less than five percent of the population (a leading homosexual researcher puts the figure at 1.7% homosexual and 1.8% bisexual). The percentage of those who are in long-term partnerships is even lower.
The Census Bureau on Tuesday released updated estimates of the number of American households headed by same-sex couples. There aren't many--only one in every 180 households. Maybe the new numbers will help leaders to realize that there's no political gain in pandering to such a tiny population.
Although the Census Bureau referred to some of those couples as "married"--in apparent violation of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (under which the federal government recognizes only opposite-sex marriages)--the data nevertheless reinforced a key argument against same-sex "marriage."
A paper based on the American Community Survey, whose findings were similar to the census count, found that even in the states which allow same-sex "marriage," only 42% of the same-sex couples who lived together identified themselves as "married."
We need to restore marriage as the normative setting for sex, procreation, and childrearing--not redefine it for the benefit of a group that's already rejected that norm.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
FREE STUFF -- THE RECEIVERS WANT THE PAYERS TO KEEP ON PAYING FOR FREE STUFF
BUT THE PAYERS DON'T WANT TO KEEP ON PAYING FOR THE FREE STUFF
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
The folks who are getting the free stuff don't like the folks who are paying for the free stuff, because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.
The folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to stop and the folks who are getting the free stuff want even more free stuff on top of the free stuff they are already getting!
Now... The people who are forcing the people who Pay for the free stuff have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff that the people who are PAYING for the free stuff are being mean, prejudiced, and racist.
So... the people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff and giving them the free stuff in the first place.
We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.
Now understand this. All great democracies have committed financial suicide somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason? The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in exchange for electing them.
The United States officially became a Republic in 1776, 235 years ago. The number of people now getting free stuff outnumbers the people paying for the free stuff. We have one chance to change that in 2012. Failure to change that spells the end of the United States as we know it.
ELECTION 2012 IS COMING
A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!
Borders: Closed!
Language: English only!
Culture: Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!
Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!
NO freebies to Non-Citizens!
WE THE PEOPLE ARE COMING!!!
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
HOMELAND SECURITY RELEASED TERROR OPERATIVE
WHO ILLEGALLY CROSSED BORDER
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dhs-released-terror-operative-who-illegally-crossed-border-pjm-exclusive/
Pajamas Media -- 9/26/2011 -- Patrick Poole
Two Bangladeshis who were caught by Customs and Border Protection illegally crossing the border in June 2010 admitted under questioning that they were members of a designated terrorist organization that signed on to a fatwa by Osama bin Laden pledging to wage war against Americans.
But amazingly, after one of the men requested asylum, he was released on bond. And now one Homeland Security official tells me, concerning the released terror operative, “We don’t have the slightest idea where he is now.”
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dhs-released-terror-operative-who-illegally-crossed-border-pjm-exclusive/
Pajamas Media -- 9/26/2011 -- Patrick Poole
Two Bangladeshis who were caught by Customs and Border Protection illegally crossing the border in June 2010 admitted under questioning that they were members of a designated terrorist organization that signed on to a fatwa by Osama bin Laden pledging to wage war against Americans.
But amazingly, after one of the men requested asylum, he was released on bond. And now one Homeland Security official tells me, concerning the released terror operative, “We don’t have the slightest idea where he is now.”
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
WHAT'S THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION ANYWAY ?
Is it reading, writing, and arithmetic ? Or something else?
Townhall -- Marybeth Hicks -- 9/28/2011
Barely enough time has passed for bologna sandwiches to begin rotting in school lockers, yet the 2011-2012 school year is shaping up to be one of the stinkiest ever, if we’re measuring in episodes of putrid political correctness and radicalism.
Already:
A group in Brookline, Massachusetts is working to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from its school district on the grounds that reciting it is “un-American” and also might promote bullying of students who refuse to say it;
A student in Fort Worth, Texas, was suspended for expressing privately to another student, unrelated to the content of the German class in which they were, that his Christian beliefs taught him that homosexuality is wrong. The teacher, overhearing the private comment, sent the student to the principal’s office for disciplinary action – not for holding a side conversation during class, but for opposing homosexuality;
A mother in the Sierra Sands Unified School District in California learned from her kindergarten and third-grade daughters that a male employee of the school cafeteria came to work attired in make-up and a tank top, revealing a bra with exposed straps. The District claimed, “its hands were tied” because, while the attire in question would not be permitted for students, it could not limit a transvestite from dressing in drag for work even if such behavior disrupts the learning environment.
Meanwhile, despite abysmal progress on the core subjects necessary to be considered nominally well-educated, students in the District of Columbia’s 5th, 8th and 10th grades will take the nation’s first standardized sex ed test come the spring.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
BIG BROTHER TARGETS CHRISTIANS
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011092814593/life-and-science/culture-wars/18-examples-of-how-christians-are-being-specifically-targeted-by-big-brother.html?utm_source=Right+Side+News&utm_campaign=6450acdaa2-daily-rss-newsletter&utm_medium=email
18 Examples of How Christians are Being Specifically Targeted by Big Brother
Right Side news -- 9/82/2011
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
18 Examples of How Christians are Being Specifically Targeted by Big Brother
Right Side news -- 9/82/2011
When the freedom of speech of one group is being threatened, it is a threat to all of us. Just because you may not be a Christian, don't think that what you are about to read is not a problem for you as well. The truth is that any individual or group that does not "fit in" with the new "politically-correct" global system that is emerging is going to be persecuted sooner or later. In our society today, it has become quite fashionable to bash Christians.
In fact, I am quite certain that some of the comments that get left after this article will say really horrible things about Christians. But after "Big Brother" is done with the Christians, are you sure that they will not come after you next? When I speak of "Big Brother", I am not just speaking of the government. In today's world, giant corporations and the mainstream media also play instrumental roles in the totalitarian police state prison grid that is being constructed all around us. The elite control the government, they run nearly all of the major corporations and they own most of the major media outlets. Anyone that does not "conform" to their system is a threat. As time goes by, the persecution of those that attempt to "rebel" against their system is only going to become more intense.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
TIMES COMPREHENSIVE ATLAS OF THE WORLD -- NOT SO COMPREHENSIVE
http://conservativebyte.com/2011/09/overestimating-global-warming-scientists-say-new-map-of-greenland-needs-more-ice/
Conservative Byte.com -- 9/26/2011
Overestimating Global Warming?
Maps have been released, but neglect to show all of the real ice on Greenland
Scientists Say new Map of Greenland Needs More Ice
Click the web link to see the map and the real ice.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Conservative Byte.com -- 9/26/2011
Overestimating Global Warming?
Maps have been released, but neglect to show all of the real ice on Greenland
Scientists Say new Map of Greenland Needs More Ice
Click the web link to see the map and the real ice.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
WHY CHRISTIANITY IS A RELIGION OF PEACE AND ISLAM IS NOT
http://godfatherpolitics.com/1164/why-christianity-is-a-religion-of-peace-and-islam-is-not/
Godfather Politics -- 9/26/2011
The next time you go through security at an airport, ask yourself why you have to show your ID at least twice, put small bottles of liquid in a quart-size bag, remove every bit of metal from your body and place the whole lot in a plastic container, remove your belt and shoes, take your computer out of its bag and place into in a plastic container, undergo a near-strip search if one of the metal detectors goes off, be subjected to a forensic analysis of your carry on bag due to a random call out. Is it because TSA suspects that Bible-toting, fundamentalist Christians might hijack the plane or that a group of Islamic extremists who have just prayed to Allah might do it?
Godfather Politics -- 9/26/2011
The next time you go through security at an airport, ask yourself why you have to show your ID at least twice, put small bottles of liquid in a quart-size bag, remove every bit of metal from your body and place the whole lot in a plastic container, remove your belt and shoes, take your computer out of its bag and place into in a plastic container, undergo a near-strip search if one of the metal detectors goes off, be subjected to a forensic analysis of your carry on bag due to a random call out. Is it because TSA suspects that Bible-toting, fundamentalist Christians might hijack the plane or that a group of Islamic extremists who have just prayed to Allah might do it?
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Monday, September 26, 2011
UN AGENDA 21 -- COMING TO A NEIGHBORHOOD NEAR YOU
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_agenda_21_coming_to_a_neigh.html
American Thinker -- 7/28/2011 -- Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild
Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks
American Thinker -- 7/28/2011 -- Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild
Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn't care less whether it's called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:
Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks
- Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers
- Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums
- Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities
- Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods
PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS -- WHO NEEDS 'EM ?
American Thinker -- 9/26/2011 -- Chris W. Bell
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/public_sector_employees_need_protection_from_government_but_we_dont.html
Public Sector Employees Need protection from Government, But We Don't?
But if government is the protector of the working man, and since public sector workers are employees of the government, then there should be no reason for public sector workers to want or need a union, because the government can be trusted to be fair.
If the liberal premise about the fairness of government were true, then the only workers who don't need union representation are public sector employees.
But as an advocate of capitalism, objectivism, and constitutionally limited republics, and in light of current trends, I can see one group of government employees whose unionization would benefit us all; if only the Senate and House of Representatives were to unionize and go out on strike.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/public_sector_employees_need_protection_from_government_but_we_dont.html
Public Sector Employees Need protection from Government, But We Don't?
But if government is the protector of the working man, and since public sector workers are employees of the government, then there should be no reason for public sector workers to want or need a union, because the government can be trusted to be fair.
If the liberal premise about the fairness of government were true, then the only workers who don't need union representation are public sector employees.
But as an advocate of capitalism, objectivism, and constitutionally limited republics, and in light of current trends, I can see one group of government employees whose unionization would benefit us all; if only the Senate and House of Representatives were to unionize and go out on strike.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
WHY YOUNG AMERICANS CAN'T THINK MORALLY
National Review Online -=- Dennis Prager -- 9/20/2011
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/277693/why-young-americans-can-t-think-morally-dennis-prager
Moral Standards Have been replaced by feelings.
This latest study cited by David Brooks confirms what conservatives have known for a generation: Moral standards have been replaced by feelings. Of course, those on the left only believe this when an “eminent sociologist” is cited by a writer at a major liberal newspaper.
the reason for this disturbing trend: namely, secularism.
One key reason is what secularism does to moral standards. If moral standards are not rooted in God, they do not objectively exist. Good and evil are no more real than “yummy” and “yucky.” They are simply a matter of personal preference. One of the foremost liberal philosophers, Richard Rorty, an atheist, acknowledged that for the secular liberal, “There is no answer to the question, ‘Why not be cruel?’”
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/277693/why-young-americans-can-t-think-morally-dennis-prager
Moral Standards Have been replaced by feelings.
This latest study cited by David Brooks confirms what conservatives have known for a generation: Moral standards have been replaced by feelings. Of course, those on the left only believe this when an “eminent sociologist” is cited by a writer at a major liberal newspaper.
the reason for this disturbing trend: namely, secularism.
One key reason is what secularism does to moral standards. If moral standards are not rooted in God, they do not objectively exist. Good and evil are no more real than “yummy” and “yucky.” They are simply a matter of personal preference. One of the foremost liberal philosophers, Richard Rorty, an atheist, acknowledged that for the secular liberal, “There is no answer to the question, ‘Why not be cruel?’”
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
MEET SOME OF AMERICA'S REAL BULLIES
Godfather Politics -- 9/25/2011
America’s real bullies are almost never criticized. Homosexual groups have been bullying companies, movie studios, schools, and Christian groups for decades over homosexual issues. I’ve had personal experience with them. I was invited to participate in an open forum on homosexuality and the rights of employers not to hire people based on moral and behavior issues. As soon as I made a comment, the mostly homosexual audience began to shout and blow whistles. They are afraid that the general public will start thinking through what homosexuality is all about and the implications for their children..
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
America’s real bullies are almost never criticized. Homosexual groups have been bullying companies, movie studios, schools, and Christian groups for decades over homosexual issues. I’ve had personal experience with them. I was invited to participate in an open forum on homosexuality and the rights of employers not to hire people based on moral and behavior issues. As soon as I made a comment, the mostly homosexual audience began to shout and blow whistles. They are afraid that the general public will start thinking through what homosexuality is all about and the implications for their children..
Homosexuals will claim that their cause is a “civil rights” issue, similar to the hard-fought struggle that Blacks have gone through. The analogy is false. Homosexuality is what people do. The euphemism “gay” has been used by the homosexual movement to hide the fact that homosexuality is really same-sex sex. To describe what homosexuals do with their “sexual equipment” would turn off many readers at this point. The very nature of the act is unnatural by definition, and any relationship based on same-sex intercourse is “against nature,” that is, against the way God made us as sexual beings (Gen. 2:18–25; Rom. 1:26–27). This is why Colin Powell wrote some years ago how it is inappropriate to link homosexual behavior with the civil rights movement. He said: “Skin color is a benign, non‑behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of human behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument.”[
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
WHY WOULD THE FEDERAL RESERVE IDENTIFY KEY BLOGGERS ? ? ?
And Monitor Billions of Conversations? ALL ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM !
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011092614581/us/politics-and-economics/the-federal-reserve-plans-to-identify-qkey-bloggersq-and-monitor-billions-of-conversations.html?utm_source=Right+Side+News&utm_campaign=2d6d006773-daily-rss-newsletter&utm_medium=email
Right Side News -- 9/26/2011 --
The Federal Reserve Plans to Identify "Key Bloggers" and Monitor Billions of Conversations
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011092614581/us/politics-and-economics/the-federal-reserve-plans-to-identify-qkey-bloggersq-and-monitor-billions-of-conversations.html?utm_source=Right+Side+News&utm_campaign=2d6d006773-daily-rss-newsletter&utm_medium=email
Right Side News -- 9/26/2011 --
The Federal Reserve Plans to Identify "Key Bloggers" and Monitor Billions of Conversations
The Federal Reserve Plans To Identify "Key Bloggers" And Monitor Billions Of Conversations About The Fed On Facebook, Twitter, Forums And Blogs
The Federal Reserve wants to know what you are saying about it. In fact, the Federal Reserve has announced plans to identify "key bloggers" and to monitor "billions of conversations" about the Fed on Facebook, Twitter, forums and blogs. This is yet another sign that the alternative media is having a dramatic impact.
The Federal Reserve wants to know what you are saying about it. In fact, the Federal Reserve has announced plans to identify "key bloggers" and to monitor "billions of conversations" about the Fed on Facebook, Twitter, forums and blogs. This is yet another sign that the alternative media is having a dramatic impact.
In other words, the Federal Reserve wants to develop a highly sophisticated system that will gather everything that you and I say about the Federal Reserve on the Internet and that will analyze what our feelings about the Fed are. Obviously, any "positive" feelings about the Fed would not be a problem. What they really want to do is to gather information on everyone that views the Federal Reserve negatively. It is unclear how they plan to use this information once they have it, but considering how many alternative media sources have been shut down lately, this is obviously a very troubling sign.
Hopefully you understand this already, but nothing posted on the Internet is ever anonymous. Everything on the Internet is gathered by a vast host of organizations and is used for a wide variety of purposes. Data mining has become a billion dollar industry, and it is only going to keep growing.
You may think that you are "anonymous" when you criticize organizations like the Fed, but the truth is that if you are loud enough they will see it and they will make a record of it.
Recently, a very creepy website known as "Attack Watch" was launched to gather information on those saying "negative" things about Barack Obama.
Suddenly, everyone seems obsessed with what you and I are saying.
This just shows how the power of the alternative media is growing.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
JUSTICE DEPARMENT ONLY HIRES LEFTIST LAWYERS
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/%e2%80%98every-single-one%e2%80%99-fallout-justice-dept-in-turmoil-from-pjmedia-series/?singlepage=true
"Every Single One" Fallout: Justice Dept. in Turmoil from PJMedia Series
Pajamas Media -- 9/26/2011 -- David Steinberg
113 to Zero
Leftist lawyers: 113
Moderate, non-ideological, or conservative lawyers: 0.
That represents the basest headline for the series, the matter-of-fact evidence that should lead any reasonable observer to believe the DOJ has employed an illegal political litmus test during the interview process. But the “Every Single One” series has provided additional benefits: the results present the inherent flaw in leftism’s perversion of the term “civil rights,” while providing a real world example of the flawed belief actualized. Additionally, the “Every Single One” series presents ramifications that reach far beyond the individuals most directly affected by DOJ activity.
We hope not to understate it: this perversion of “civil rights“ is the beating heart of leftism itself.
“Insufficient Evidence to Prosecute … ”
“Every Single One” presented key information from the resumes of each of the 113 career attorneys hired to serve within 10 of these 11 sections since the appointment of Eric Holder. The key information presented provided substantial evidence of the political leanings of each hire. In each case, enough evidence was available for a reasonable observer to determine that the hire was neither a conservative, moderate, nor apolitical.
Glenn Fine was still IG until January 2011: his earlier concern about the “serious problems and misconduct” inherent in politicized hiring — which resulted in several unnecessary resignations — had faded when Eric Holder took over the Department under his watch. Fine’s enforcement was blatantly uneven, and overlaps with our second concern: a significant number of Americans are neither protected by our civil rights laws nor by the appointed Department watchman.
Instead, newly disclosed documents show, the lawyers hired over the past two years at the division have been far more likely to have civil rights backgrounds — and to have ties to traditional civil rights organizations with liberal reputations, like the American Civil Liberties Union or the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Bombshell Number Two, and the Big Reveal
Why might DOJ be so panicked? While the resumes speak for themselves, prosecution within a federal agency generally requires a smoking gun, and perhaps DOJ fears that it has already been found. They should be.
As Christian Adams has previously written in “Every Single One”:
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
What’s happened up until now, and what internal leaks say about what’s coming. Hint: jobs may now be at stake. (This is the twelfth of a series of articles about the Justice Department's hiring practices since President Obama took office. Read parts one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, and eleven.)
"Every Single One" Fallout: Justice Dept. in Turmoil from PJMedia Series
Pajamas Media -- 9/26/2011 -- David Steinberg
113 to Zero
Leftist lawyers: 113
Moderate, non-ideological, or conservative lawyers: 0.
That represents the basest headline for the series, the matter-of-fact evidence that should lead any reasonable observer to believe the DOJ has employed an illegal political litmus test during the interview process. But the “Every Single One” series has provided additional benefits: the results present the inherent flaw in leftism’s perversion of the term “civil rights,” while providing a real world example of the flawed belief actualized. Additionally, the “Every Single One” series presents ramifications that reach far beyond the individuals most directly affected by DOJ activity.
We hope not to understate it: this perversion of “civil rights“ is the beating heart of leftism itself.
“Insufficient Evidence to Prosecute … ”
“Every Single One” presented key information from the resumes of each of the 113 career attorneys hired to serve within 10 of these 11 sections since the appointment of Eric Holder. The key information presented provided substantial evidence of the political leanings of each hire. In each case, enough evidence was available for a reasonable observer to determine that the hire was neither a conservative, moderate, nor apolitical.
Glenn Fine was still IG until January 2011: his earlier concern about the “serious problems and misconduct” inherent in politicized hiring — which resulted in several unnecessary resignations — had faded when Eric Holder took over the Department under his watch. Fine’s enforcement was blatantly uneven, and overlaps with our second concern: a significant number of Americans are neither protected by our civil rights laws nor by the appointed Department watchman.
Instead, newly disclosed documents show, the lawyers hired over the past two years at the division have been far more likely to have civil rights backgrounds — and to have ties to traditional civil rights organizations with liberal reputations, like the American Civil Liberties Union or the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Bombshell Number Two, and the Big Reveal
Why might DOJ be so panicked? While the resumes speak for themselves, prosecution within a federal agency generally requires a smoking gun, and perhaps DOJ fears that it has already been found. They should be.
As Christian Adams has previously written in “Every Single One”:
Loretta King, while serving as the acting assistant attorney general for civil rights at the outset of the Obama administration, ordered the resumes of highly qualified applicants to be rejected only because they didn’t have political or left-wing civil rights experience. Multiple DOJ sources with direct knowledge of hiring committee practices have confirmed this to me.Which takes us to the Big Reveal: all that we have presented up to this point should upset you as a citizen, a taxpayer, but we are not close to having completed publication of all that we have uncovered. The Department of Justice has done much further abuse to your liberty and property, committed significantly more acts of lawlessness on your dime. Additional articles will be forthcoming on PJMedia within a week or so.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
INCOME TAX AND FAIRNESS -- WHO DECIDES WHAT'S FAIR? AND FOR WHOM?
http://www.floridatoday.com/article/20110920/COLUMNISTS0205/110919013/Guest-column-Income-tax-fairness-Sept-20-
FLORIDA TODAY -- 9/19/2011 -- DON GILLELAND
The political mantra this season is the rich must pay their fair share of federal income taxes. What does that mean and who decides what is fair?
We have a regressive income-tax system. The more money you make, the higher the percentage of it must be paid to the government, and if you don’t make enough, the government will give you some in the form of welfare.
Even if we took all the money wealthy people make, it wouldn’t begin to be enough to pay for all of the benefits we need as a nation.
Fair is a relative thing, and it isn’t likely we will agree on a national definition any time soon.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
FLORIDA TODAY -- 9/19/2011 -- DON GILLELAND
The political mantra this season is the rich must pay their fair share of federal income taxes. What does that mean and who decides what is fair?
We have a regressive income-tax system. The more money you make, the higher the percentage of it must be paid to the government, and if you don’t make enough, the government will give you some in the form of welfare.
Even if we took all the money wealthy people make, it wouldn’t begin to be enough to pay for all of the benefits we need as a nation.
Fair is a relative thing, and it isn’t likely we will agree on a national definition any time soon.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
IN FAIRNESS, THE RICH ARE DUE A HUGE TAX CUT
http://biggovernment.com/smotley/2011/09/26/if-the-rich-are-to-pay-their-fair-share-theyre-due-for-a-huge-tax-cut/
Big Government -- Seton Motley --
(Someone needs to introduce these people to Reality. Here in Reality, life isn’t fair. The sooner they realize this – and stop trying to use government to make it so – the better off we all will be.)
The American people are overwhelmingly underwhelmed by the President’s latest bit of Leftism. (Not to mention many Congressional Democrats.) I wonder why?
Perhaps it’s the fact that the federal government has increased its per annum spending by 29% in just the last four years – from $2.73 trillion to $3.82 trillion.
During the depths of the Great Recession – when the private sector was least equipped to shoulder the gigantic new burden.
And that a return to 2007 spending levels would negate most of our deficit problem, and begin to work dramatically on our debt problem – without raising taxes a cent.
As Solyndra yet again reminds us, the federal government was not designed to be a venture capital firm. Because they have for one hundred-plus years proven utterly incapable of identifying good ways to “invest” (read: spend) our money. In a pathetic attempt to create (or save?) jobs – or for any other reason.
We the People see the government taking and wasting more money than ever before – and are thusly less than enthusiastically receptive to President Obama’s call for anyone to fork over any more coin.
Especially when we know that there simply aren’t anywhere near enough “rich” people to tax our way out of this spending-induced mess.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Big Government -- Seton Motley --
(Someone needs to introduce these people to Reality. Here in Reality, life isn’t fair. The sooner they realize this – and stop trying to use government to make it so – the better off we all will be.)
The American people are overwhelmingly underwhelmed by the President’s latest bit of Leftism. (Not to mention many Congressional Democrats.) I wonder why?
Perhaps it’s the fact that the federal government has increased its per annum spending by 29% in just the last four years – from $2.73 trillion to $3.82 trillion.
During the depths of the Great Recession – when the private sector was least equipped to shoulder the gigantic new burden.
And that a return to 2007 spending levels would negate most of our deficit problem, and begin to work dramatically on our debt problem – without raising taxes a cent.
As Solyndra yet again reminds us, the federal government was not designed to be a venture capital firm. Because they have for one hundred-plus years proven utterly incapable of identifying good ways to “invest” (read: spend) our money. In a pathetic attempt to create (or save?) jobs – or for any other reason.
We the People see the government taking and wasting more money than ever before – and are thusly less than enthusiastically receptive to President Obama’s call for anyone to fork over any more coin.
Especially when we know that there simply aren’t anywhere near enough “rich” people to tax our way out of this spending-induced mess.
The wealthiest 1% of the population earns 19% of the income but pays 37% of the income tax. The top 10% of earners pay 68% of the tab.
Meanwhile, the bottom 50%…now earn 13% of the income but pay just 3% of the taxes…. (S)ome 45% of American income earners paid no income tax at all in 2010.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
WILL AMERICA SURVIVE ITS FOOLS OR "INSIDE" TRAITORS?
Patriot Action Network – Skip MacLure – 9/25/2011
…and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive TREASON from within.
The traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.
Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106BC – 43BC.
Tell the big lie long enough and often enough, and it takes on a life of its own. The ideologically driven radicals that have completely suborned and taken over what was the Democrat party in this country have taken agitation propaganda to heights unseen outside of Nazi Germany or possibly Stalinist Russia. Dissension, class envy, racial conflict and violence are their stock in trade. Grinding poverty and enslavement of free peoples is their goal.
The results of the careful groundwork that had been laid down in this country have their roots in the rise of international communism.
More recently, they can be found in Franklin Roosevelt’s ‘new deal‘. Exploration of the history of that period (the history not taught in most schools) was one of a massive shift of power to the federal government and toward socialism.
In terms of ending the great depression, as we now know, the New Deal’s policies were a complete failure…
‘Social Security’, a Ponzi scheme of monumental proportions.
The highest court in the land turned from interpretation of the law with respect to the Constitution to judicial activism, which continues to eat away the fundamental pillars of our society to this day.
Generations of dishonest, self-serving politicians, with no other motive than the acquisition of personal wealth and power
We have no one to blame but ourselves. . . . “The Easier, Softer Way”. We completely ignored the lessons of history and now we are relearning them the hard way.
What we are witnessing is nothing more nor less than the second American Revolution, as unique in its bloodless non-violence as America herself.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
PRESIDENT OBAMA AND CLASS WARFARE
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2011/09/26/lemiska-another-salvo-in-the-war-on-wealth/?subscriber=1
GOP USA -- 9/26/2011 -- Peter Lemiska
Lemiska: Anoth Salvo in the War On Wealth
Well, beside the fact that wealth redistribution represents the very antithesis of American values, there is this to consider. When the tax increases for wealthy Americans fail to eliminate the national debt, and can no longer sustain the government’s ever-increasing entitlement programs, the Democrats will have no other option but to redefine “wealthy” downward. They will inevitably raise the tax rates on those very same people who today demand that the wealthy pay more.
Class warfare is not new. Socialists and communists have used it throughout history to spawn social revolution.
Karl Marx
Andy Stern, former president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), invokes the communist rallying cry “Workers of the world unite,” that’s class warfare.
Teamster President James Hoffa attacks the critics of expanding union benefits, saying, “…let’s take these sons of bitches out.” Then he’s back-slapped by a smiling Barack Obama. That’s class warfare.
It’s ironic that, in this country, the most vocal critics of wealth and capitalism are among the most affluent beneficiaries of our free enterprise system. Like all socialists though, while they condemn the greed of big business, at the same time they cultivate those very same human failings, greed and envy, in an effort to incite the less fortunate and convince them that they deserve more – that they deserve what the affluent have created.
we have forgotten that it was never intended to be a land of equal affluence and property, but rather a land of equal opportunity.
READER COMMENT: As Kids growing up in America the dream was to become a millionaire. Obama and his Liberal cabal of wealth redistributors has extinguished the flame of this desire in the breasts of the American youth who find no mercy at the hands of the Liberal tax gatherers to be motivated to succeed or sacrifice. These are the gosling geese that should have matured to the gooses who laid our present and future golden eggs, which have been slain and eaten at the Socialist table of hunger and wealth redistribution.
Just what fool would sacrifice working 60-70 hours per week to create a business that is forced to hand over 35% of the profits to Obama and his Acorn losers? This is what America has become. This is what our own greed and laziness has produced. This is the insanity of the Liberal mind infection upon a formerly healthy body of Americans. We all got Goosed all right!
LET THE AMERICAN EARNERS BE THE SPENDERS!
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
GOP USA -- 9/26/2011 -- Peter Lemiska
Lemiska: Anoth Salvo in the War On Wealth
Well, beside the fact that wealth redistribution represents the very antithesis of American values, there is this to consider. When the tax increases for wealthy Americans fail to eliminate the national debt, and can no longer sustain the government’s ever-increasing entitlement programs, the Democrats will have no other option but to redefine “wealthy” downward. They will inevitably raise the tax rates on those very same people who today demand that the wealthy pay more.
Class warfare is not new. Socialists and communists have used it throughout history to spawn social revolution.
Karl Marx
Andy Stern, former president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), invokes the communist rallying cry “Workers of the world unite,” that’s class warfare.
Teamster President James Hoffa attacks the critics of expanding union benefits, saying, “…let’s take these sons of bitches out.” Then he’s back-slapped by a smiling Barack Obama. That’s class warfare.
It’s ironic that, in this country, the most vocal critics of wealth and capitalism are among the most affluent beneficiaries of our free enterprise system. Like all socialists though, while they condemn the greed of big business, at the same time they cultivate those very same human failings, greed and envy, in an effort to incite the less fortunate and convince them that they deserve more – that they deserve what the affluent have created.
we have forgotten that it was never intended to be a land of equal affluence and property, but rather a land of equal opportunity.
READER COMMENT: As Kids growing up in America the dream was to become a millionaire. Obama and his Liberal cabal of wealth redistributors has extinguished the flame of this desire in the breasts of the American youth who find no mercy at the hands of the Liberal tax gatherers to be motivated to succeed or sacrifice. These are the gosling geese that should have matured to the gooses who laid our present and future golden eggs, which have been slain and eaten at the Socialist table of hunger and wealth redistribution.
Just what fool would sacrifice working 60-70 hours per week to create a business that is forced to hand over 35% of the profits to Obama and his Acorn losers? This is what America has become. This is what our own greed and laziness has produced. This is the insanity of the Liberal mind infection upon a formerly healthy body of Americans. We all got Goosed all right!
LET THE AMERICAN EARNERS BE THE SPENDERS!
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
PULPIT FREEDOM SUNDAY 10/2/2011
Glenn Beck speaks about Sunday 10/2/2011 when hundreds of pastors will record their sermons and send them in to the IRS for challenge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZVbrTBqMhM
Speak Up Movement -- Protect and Promote the Rights of our Churches
http://speakupmovement.org/church/LearnMore/details/4702
Who decides what can be said from the pulpits of America's churches? For more than 50 years, it has been the IRS that had a say in what a pastor or priest may preach.
This is a restriction on the First Amendment rights of ALL citizens in America, and is being challenged.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZVbrTBqMhM
Speak Up Movement -- Protect and Promote the Rights of our Churches
http://speakupmovement.org/church/LearnMore/details/4702
Who decides what can be said from the pulpits of America's churches? For more than 50 years, it has been the IRS that had a say in what a pastor or priest may preach.
This is a restriction on the First Amendment rights of ALL citizens in America, and is being challenged.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
PRESIDENT OBAMA GAFFE: JEW / JANITOR TAX RATE
Daily Caller -- 9/26/2011 -- Jamie Weinstein
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/25/obama-gaffe-president-says-billionaires-should-pay-the-jew-tax-rate/
Obama Gaffe: President Says Billionaires Should Pay "Jew" Tax Rate
Speaking at the Congressional Black Caucus annual awards dinner in Washington Saturday night, President Obama made a verbal boo-boo.
While defending his call for the rich to pay more in taxes, the president said he didn’t mind people calling him a class warrior for merely asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a Jew. Whoops!
The president meant to say “janitor” instead of “Jew,” and he immediately corrected himself. After all, he doesn’t need any more problems keeping Jewish voters enthusiastic about his re-election bid.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/25/obama-gaffe-president-says-billionaires-should-pay-the-jew-tax-rate/
Obama Gaffe: President Says Billionaires Should Pay "Jew" Tax Rate
Speaking at the Congressional Black Caucus annual awards dinner in Washington Saturday night, President Obama made a verbal boo-boo.
While defending his call for the rich to pay more in taxes, the president said he didn’t mind people calling him a class warrior for merely asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a Jew. Whoops!
The president meant to say “janitor” instead of “Jew,” and he immediately corrected himself. After all, he doesn’t need any more problems keeping Jewish voters enthusiastic about his re-election bid.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Sunday, September 25, 2011
OIL: 10 CENTS PROFIT / 50 CENTS TAX
Godfather Politics – 9/24/2011
OIL: What I would Do If I Were President
Politicians don’t want to talk about high gasoline taxes. In fact, revelations of high taxes on gasoline might anger the American public and produce sympathy for “big oil.” It would expose the fraud of “price gouging” by the oil companies. I’m hopeful if prices remain high that more people will start talking about how state and federal governments are the real problem.
Maybe even some in the mainstream media will start asking lawmakers why oil profits of about ten cents per gallon are “obscene” but nearly 50 cents per gallon of taxes is . . . patriotic?
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Thursday, September 22, 2011
"DEVELOPING" COUNTRIES GROW FASTER THAN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
GOP USA – 9/22/2011 – Michael Barone
Barone: What “Developing” Countries Can Teach the U.S.
Today, we've been seeing enormous growth in what we have been accustomed to call "developing" countries. They have been growing nearly four times faster than "developed" countries, and they account for nearly half of total global investment and global economic growth today.
In effect, we are going through a period when China and India -- with one-third of the world's population -- are moving rapidly from (to use the old terminology) Third World to First World status. That's true as well of millions in developing countries in Latin America, Asia and even Africa .
Nothing like this enormous transformation has ever happened before, and nothing like it will ever happen again.
. . . policies that encourage self-advancing behavior and leave the way open for human creativity to flourish can accomplish more than simple transfers from the affluent to the impoverished
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
FASCISM DEFINES PRSIDENT OBAMA BECAUSE THE TERM FITS
American Thinker – 9/22/2011 – Steve McCann
Obama’s Fascist Economy
Barack Obama and his minions in the administration as well as many Democrats in the Congress are often described as Socialists, or in the extreme as Marxists. However, their actions and strategy are straight out of the fascist economic playbook. They have become the modern reincarnation of the fascist mindset, without the militarism of Italy and Germany , that dominated Europe in the 1920s and '30s.
Over the past seventy years, the left and their allies in the media have succeeded in labeling fascism as a right-wing or conservative philosophy when it in reality was an offshoot of socialism.
Socialism/Marxism seeks the total control of a society's economy through complete state control of the means of production and income.
Fascism seeks that same control, indirectly by the state domination of private ownership, as well as controlling individual income and wealth through taxation and regulation. Jonah Goldberg's masterpiece Liberal Fascism convincingly demonstrates the progressive roots of fascism.
A legacy of the FDR years is the nearly 170,000 pages of federal regulations that exist today and intrude into all aspects of the day-to-day life of every American. However, Barack Obama has not only added to the regulatory burden, but also taken actions which are geared to further establishing a fascist economy.
ObamaCare is not about health care, per se; rather, it is intended to dictate to business and the individual what insurance they must buy, what health care they are allowed to access, and ultimately what behavior is acceptable -- all at the whim of a centralized bureaucracy. The Dodd-Frank Bill firmly establishes the concept of "too big to fail" for certain financial institutions, thereby subjecting them to the absolute control of the state while allowing, and in many cases forcing, others to cease doing business, as well as instituting lending and operating policies determined by government regulators.
As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalistic veneer. In its day (the 1920's and 1930's), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and Marxism, with its violent socially divisive prosecution of the bourgeoisie.
Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices; fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. [Emphasis added.]
Under fascism, the state, through official agencies, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and "excess" incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or "loans".
To maintain high employment and minimize popular discontent, fascist governments also undertook massive public-works programs financed by steep taxes, borrowing and fiat money creation.
However, as with FDR, chances are that it will not succeed in America , with its history of individualism and entrepreneurship -- but only if the current citizenry recognizes what is the Obama end-game. It is time to call what is being pursued by Barack Obama what it is: FASCISM.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
SOCIAL SECURITY, PONZI SCHEME AND PAYING "FAIR SHARE"
The Patriot Post – Walter E. Williams – 9/21/2011
Gov. Perry’s Right About Social Security
Another lie in the Social Security pamphlet is: "Beginning November 24, 1936, the United States government will set up a Social Security account for you. ... The checks will come to you as a right." Therefore, Americans were sold on the belief that Social Security is like a retirement account and money placed in it is our property. The fact of the matter is you have no property right whatsoever to your Social Security "contributions."
In a U.S. Supreme Court case, Helvering v. Davis (1937), the court held that Social Security is not an insurance program, saying, "The proceeds of both (employee and employer) taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like internal revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way."
In a later Supreme Court case, Flemming v. Nestor (1960), the court said, "To engraft upon the Social Security system a concept of 'accrued property rights' would deprive it of the flexibility and boldness in adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands."
The Social Security Administration is trying to clean up its history of deception in its website (http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html)
Three Nobel laureate economists have testified that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. Dr. Paul Samuelson called it "the greatest Ponzi game ever contrived." Dr. Milton Friedman said it was "the biggest Ponzi scheme on earth." Dr. Paul Krugman predicted that "the Ponzi game will soon be over."
BLOGGER COMMENT: If Social Security is "means tested", that is,wealthy people who pay into the system for years but are denied Social Security payments because of personal wealth, should they be allowed to keep their own money and discontinue payments into Social Security at age 65 if they continue to earn a living.
ALSO, shouldn't wealthy individuals deserve a TAX CREDIT for every penny they paid into Social Security for decades? They most likely started out NOT wealthy and prospered as they moved up the ladder as responsibilities increased and income grew. So these individuals paid into Social Security assuming it would be part of their retirement package. Then, upon retirement, decades of contributions are denied them (hundreds of thousands of dollars) and President Obama insists they continue to "pay their fair share.
To me, this is GOVERNMENT THEFT.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
ENERGY DEPT: WASTE, FRAUD, ABUSE
http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/21/energy-dept-weatherization-programs-rife-with-waste-fraud-inspector-general-audits-show/
Daily Caller -- Amanda Carey -- 9/21/2011
All this was supported by President Obama.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Daily Caller -- Amanda Carey -- 9/21/2011
All this was supported by President Obama.
Shortly after taking office, President Barack Obama defended the weatherization portion of the stimulus bill in a February 2009 CBS interview, saying it would immediately put people back to work, reduce energy costs and lay the groundwork for future energy independence.
“What would be a more effective stimulus package than that?” said Obama at the time. “That’s exactly the kind of program that we should be funding.”
In total, the stimulus program allocated about $5 billion to the cause of home weatherization, outfitting homes with the latest green technology in order to reduce energy prices.
It’s now three years later, and it appears the weatherization program has gone down a road of waste, fraud and abuse.
Take Illinois, Obama’s home state, as an example.
Hundreds of millions to many states that results in shoddy workmanship, hazardous conditions for homeowners, and high cost to the subsidized homeowners.“What would be a more effective stimulus package than that?” said Obama at the time. “That’s exactly the kind of program that we should be funding.”
In total, the stimulus program allocated about $5 billion to the cause of home weatherization, outfitting homes with the latest green technology in order to reduce energy prices.
It’s now three years later, and it appears the weatherization program has gone down a road of waste, fraud and abuse.
Take Illinois, Obama’s home state, as an example.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)