UNFPA
to Push Population Control at Rio +20 UN
Conference
LifeNews.com – Timothy Herrmann –
5/7/2012
Concerned about the
strain the world’s growing population is putting on the environment and its
natural resources, the UNFPA has started marketing its population control
policies under new rhetoric, which includes the catch phrase “demography is not
destiny”. This phrase established itself firmly in the UNFPA lexicon earlier this year when the UN agency
convened a group of academics and international organizations to “explore the
links between population and water, energy and food security” at the World
Economic Forum (WEF).
Here
is an example, taken straight from the draft yesterday
afternoon:
We
reaffirm our commitment to gender equality and the right of women, men
and adolescents to decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their
sexual and
reproductive health including affordable, acceptable
and accessible family planning methods. We agree to promote health systems that
provide safe, effective and affordable modern methods of family planning,
which are essential
for women’s health and for advancing gender equality, and will also influence
population
dynamics, contributing to
poverty eradication and
sustainable development.
The
UNFPA has chosen a rights based approach to population control because it cannot
implement its ideology by force. It has already been down that path, most notoriously through its funding of a forced
sterilization under the Dictatorship of Alberto Fujimori in Peru in the
1990′s, and its reputation still suffers because of
it.
The
first Rio Declaration on Environment and
Development, finalized in 1992, does not include a single mention of the
word “population” because of the negative association that the word has with
development. Developing countries know that when the word population is used in
relation to development it usually means population control, or at the very
least calls for developing countries to reduce their populations in order to
achieve development.
their
new “rights based” approach to sustainable development. In their minds, if
access to reproductive services is a right, it magically becomes something
positive and can be used, without anyone crying foul, to encourage individuals
freely choose to regulate their own fertility. It’s all in the
marketing.
However, it is not so
much the emphasis on rights alone that completes their strategy. Another key
component is the use of scare tactics that emphasize the impending disaster of a
population explosion and the shaming the developing world where population
growth is the most exponential into the self-regulation of their own
population.
The
phrase human centered is key in Rio
negotiations and refers to Principle 1 of the 1992 Rio
Declaration:
Principle
1:
Human
beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable
development
This
was made the first principle of the declaration precisely because the developing
world understood the human person as the protagonist and main beneficiary of
development, not the environment. The UNFPA has taken the term and perverted it
to its own ends, placing the human at the center of sustainable development not
as a beneficiary but as the main obstacle in its
achievement.
FOR
THE UNFPA, WHEN IT COMES TO THE GOALS OF RIO
+20, THE HUMAN PERSON IS NOT A RESOURCE BUT A PROBLEM, AND POPULATION CONTROL IS
THE SOLUTION.
Those
“demographic changes”, if the UNFPA has its way during negotiations, will not
mean an investment in infrastructure, health, employment and education, it will
mean investment in population control under the guise of “rights” and the
freedom to choose to eradicate the poor in order to eradicate
poverty.
No comments:
Post a Comment