Why is Obama Lying about Libya ?
GOP USA –
Bobby Eberle – 9/27/2012
As reported by Fox News, U.S.
intelligence officials knew within 24 hours of the assault on the U.S. Consulate
in Libya that it was a terrorist attack
and suspected Al Qaeda-tied elements were involved. Did you catch that? The
intelligence community knew almost immediately what the Obama administration
denied for days
The question to ask is "Why?" Why
did Barack Obama lead a story line that he knew was false and misleading?
Why?
Could it be that Obama just can't
bring himself to stand up to radical Muslim terrorists? If that's the case, then
he has absolutely no business being president.
Fox News military analyst Colonel
David Hunt told Breitbart News that "the rules of engagement have been changing
drastically over the last 10 years. . . The reason the surge in Iraq
worked was we had another 40,000 soldiers and the rules of engagement were
changed to allow our guys to shoot. What's happened in Libya
is the final straw of political correctness. We allowed a contractor to hire local nationals as
security guards, but said they can't have bullets. This was all part of the
point of not having a high profile in Libya ."
According to Hunt, the debacle at
the American mission in Benghazi is directly the result of Obama's new
policies. "The policy of the Obama administration led to this," he
said.
COMMENT: You almost have it
correct. Ambassador Stevens knew he was about to be attacked. The State Dept
knew it. The administration knew it. The military knew it. Why did they not put
50 Marines in there to protect USA citizens and property?
Four dead Americans is a "bump in the
road." Fifty dead Marines is a WAR with Muslim extremists. This would not look
good during a presidential campaign. Those four American citizens were
sacrificed. They were killed in favor of President Obama's
reelection.
-- RM, Bowling Green , OH
No comments:
Post a Comment