Watch this video - 4 minutes
Al Gore wanted to
present a fire tornado as proof of Climate
Change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lsyvOYcWgcg#
Now reinvigorated by the electoral success of the scientifically clueless Obama and his cronies, Gore is involved in a new bit of lunacy called the "Climate Reality Project." In early October 2012, Al Gore's Carthage Group tried again to drum up global-warming hysteria by securing the film rights to a naturally occurring firestorm filmed by Alice Springs Film and Television (ASFTV) inAustralia . An Alice Springs
filmmaker refused to sell footage of the firestorm to former US
vice-president Al Gore — to use in Mr Gore’s climate presentations — because the
event was unrelated to climate change. Using the footage in a climate-change
framework would be “deliberately deceptive”. A fire tornado is a totally natural
(but rare) phenomena which has been observed on multiple occasions over man's
history on earth. An extreme example is the 1923 Great Kantō earthquake in
Japan which ignited a large
city-sized firestorm and produced a gigantic fire tornado that killed 38,000 in
fifteen minutes in the Hifukusho-Ato region of Tokyo .
Unfortunately Al Gore combines his inherent stupidity with a mind numbing amount of blind persistence; so he unrelentingly tried a second time to get the ASFTV release of the fire tornado video via a new request from the management of the Climate Reality Project.
ASFTV responded as follows:
"As I'm sure you are aware I have previously refused a request for this footage from your Founder and Chairman on the grounds that there is no evidence to support your proposed usage. That is, that this intense, but incredibly localized, event has any relationship whatsoever to climate change/global warming. In fact from the expert advice I have received, I believe the evidence is to the contrary. Why would you request this footage if you do not have firm evidence to prove that this particular event was caused by, or was in any way attributable to, global or even regional climate change? If a project is bold enough to call itself "Climate Reality," then I would reasonably expect a great deal of fact and reality attached to it. I believe viewers all over the world would expect the same. If I tune into your special event "24 hours of reality" on November 14 and 15, how will I know which event you present is really factual and directly attributable, and which is not? Dare I say, what will be truth and what won't be? How will anyone watching know? Are all your requests for visual material to support climate change presentations made without any prior requirement for supporting evidence?"
Gore fooled us once with his computer-generated fakery. Now he's after the "real thing," except the real thing has absolutely nothing to do with global warming or climate change.
Watch this fascinating video of the Australian fire tornado here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lsyvOYcWgcg#!CB
In a sequence in
Al Gore's 2006 thoroughly debunked, propaganda laced documentary "An
Inconvenient Truth", there's a famous shot of Antarctic ice shelves breaking
apart. As discovered by ABC News in 2008, it was actually computer-generated
imagery used in the opening credits from the 2004 movie "The Day After
Tomorrow."
Now reinvigorated by the electoral success of the scientifically clueless Obama and his cronies, Gore is involved in a new bit of lunacy called the "Climate Reality Project." In early October 2012, Al Gore's Carthage Group tried again to drum up global-warming hysteria by securing the film rights to a naturally occurring firestorm filmed by Alice Springs Film and Television (ASFTV) in
Unfortunately Al Gore combines his inherent stupidity with a mind numbing amount of blind persistence; so he unrelentingly tried a second time to get the ASFTV release of the fire tornado video via a new request from the management of the Climate Reality Project.
ASFTV responded as follows:
"As I'm sure you are aware I have previously refused a request for this footage from your Founder and Chairman on the grounds that there is no evidence to support your proposed usage. That is, that this intense, but incredibly localized, event has any relationship whatsoever to climate change/global warming. In fact from the expert advice I have received, I believe the evidence is to the contrary. Why would you request this footage if you do not have firm evidence to prove that this particular event was caused by, or was in any way attributable to, global or even regional climate change? If a project is bold enough to call itself "Climate Reality," then I would reasonably expect a great deal of fact and reality attached to it. I believe viewers all over the world would expect the same. If I tune into your special event "24 hours of reality" on November 14 and 15, how will I know which event you present is really factual and directly attributable, and which is not? Dare I say, what will be truth and what won't be? How will anyone watching know? Are all your requests for visual material to support climate change presentations made without any prior requirement for supporting evidence?"
Gore fooled us once with his computer-generated fakery. Now he's after the "real thing," except the real thing has absolutely nothing to do with global warming or climate change.
Watch this fascinating video of the Australian fire tornado here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lsyvOYcWgcg#!CB
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment