Endangered: The Constitution Part 2
Townhall – Mark Baisley – 3/31/2013
Statists have fought the
purity of the First Amendment for decades. The ACLU has managed to
inculcate a popular belief in American culture and court systems that asserts
the oppression that Thomas Jefferson railed against. And amazingly, they
have used Jefferson ’s words to accomplish
their deceitful deed. In a letter of assurance to the Danbury Baptists
Association of Connecticut, Jefferson wrote,
“Believing with you that
religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes
account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers
of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with
sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that
their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation
between church and State.”
Without a Congressional
debate, nor vote in the Senate, or ratification of the states, the ACLU has
managed to establish “separation between church and state” as constitutional
dictum.
But the United States was not founded on
agnosticism. And if the courts
were to examine the whole of Jefferson ’s
writings they would find that it is wholly proper for governments to avow the
existence of the God who was acknowledged at the signing of the declaration
that begat the nation.
“We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among
Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
Implied herein is that this
Creator
(1) is God of the laws of
nature,
(2) is the creator of
humans,
(3) intended for humans to
share equal status among themselves,
(4) endowed all humans with
unalienable rights which include life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. Not every god fits this description; Sorry.
The acknowledgment of the
existence and authority of God by government entities is no way in conflict
with the First Amendment. Otherwise, the Declaration of Independence,
believed by many in 1789 to be the original Bill of Rights, would itself be
categorically unconstitutional.
A CITIZEN IS INCAPABLE OF VIOLATING THE FIRST
AMENDMENT. As is evident with every one of the Bill
of Rights, the First Amendment was never intended as a restriction on citizen
behavior. It is a restriction on government alone.
On matters of religion,
government is to remain reverent and meek as a reflection of the noble manner
that the Creator invites His followers while gracing them with free will.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment