THEY TOLERATE BABY TORTURE BUT NOT FOR TERRORISTS
THEY REFUSE TO BE EDUCATED ABOUT A "MEDICAL PROCEDURE" THAT KILLS BABIES IN THE NAME OF CHOICE
Torture inflicted by Kermit
Gosnell a picture of Abortion in America
Lifenews – Kristi Burton Brown
– 4/14/2013
In all reality, few
Americans could describe the process of abortion. It’s easy to say that you
support a supposedly “medical” procedure when you have little or no idea how
that procedure is actually performed. Read the following accurate descriptions
of abortion and see if you can fully support such actions:
Once the cervix is dilated,
the abortionist inserts tubing into the uterus and attaches the tubing to a
suction machine. Suction pulls apart the fetus’ body and out the uterus. After
suction, the doctor and nurses must reassemble the fetus’ dismembered parts to
ensure they have all the pieces.
Did you get that? The baby’s
body is literally pulled apart by the force of suction. If you want to read an
actual story about this kind of abortion, written by a former Planned
Parenthood employee who witnessed it, go
here. In part, the story relates:
At first, the baby didn’t
seem aware of the cannula. It gently probed the baby’s side, and for a quick
second I felt relief. Of course, I thought. The fetus doesn’t feel pain. I had
reassured countless women of this as I’d been taught by Planned Parenthood. The
fetal tissue feels nothing as it is removed. Get a grip, Abby. This is a
simple, quick medical procedure. My head was working hard to control my
responses, but I couldn’t shake an inner disquiet that was quickly mounting to
horror as I watched the screen.
The next movement was the
sudden jerk of a tiny foot as the baby started kicking, as if it were trying to
move away from the probing invader. As the cannula pressed its side, the baby
began struggling to turn and twist away. It seemed clear to me that it could
feel the cannula, and it did not like what it was feeling. …
My eyes shot back to the
screen again. The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I
could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. For the briefest moment the
baby looked as if it were being wrung like a dishcloth, twirled and squeezed.
And then it crumpled and began disappearing into the cannula before my eyes.
The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the
tube, and then it was gone.
Does this description sound
any less horrific than the descriptions
Gosnell’s former employees have been giving on the witness stand? Is this kind
of unspeakable torture and cruelty actually okay with Americans?
SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION
One method of abortion done
in the second trimester is described
by Warren Hern, an abortionist based in Boulder ,
Colorado . He wrote a textbook on
performing abortions and is certainly an expert.
The procedure changes
significantly at 21 weeks because fetal tissues become much more cohesive and
difficult to dismember….A long curved Mayo scissors may be necessary to
decapitate and dismember the fetus.
And before anyone starts
thinking that this procedure shouldn’t be allowed on the basis that the baby is
viable, please remember that the youngest reported surviving preemie was born
at 21
weeks and 5 days.
But, regardless of
viability, what is different about this description – decapitating a baby –
than the description
given by Steven Massof, a Gosnell employee, about what occurred in that clinic?
Later he began doing first
trimester procedures and eventually took on the ‘second tris,’ testifying that
he saw over 100 babies born alive who had their necks snipped in what he said
was ‘literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body.’
How can one procedure be any
more or less horrible than the other? This is a question Americans must face
and answer.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment