Letter to the Editor - by CB
Last year I described how the U.S. Supreme Court (five scientifically clueless lawyers assenting) made the purely scientific decision that the EPA must treat CO2 and other Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), as “pollutants” and then carryout an analysis to determine whether the increasing concentrations in atmospheric CO2 may reasonably be anticipated to endanger human health and welfare. One of the dissenting justices commented brilliantly that: “Regulating CO2 as a pollutant makes about as much sense as regulating Frisbees as a pollutant.” And how did this super-critical economy destroying scientific decision come into the purview of the United States Supreme Court? The ultra-leftist state of Massachusetts had sued the EPA for an alleged future injury:
“The State of Massachusetts would in
the future lose land due to the catastrophic rising of the sea resulting from
anthropogenic global warming.” So an ultimately loony, frivolous lawsuit is the
“smoking gun” evidence for the birth of this devastating EPA insanity.
The Court did not mandate
regulation; rather it mandated that EPA go through an Endangerment Finding
process. The EPA did perform a
ridiculously bogus scientific analysis and published its ruling in December
2009 that CO2 must be regulated by the government as a pollutant. This EPA
finding and associated rulings were immediately challenged in the DC Circuit
Court and the DC Circuit Court ruled on June 26, 2012 in favor of the EPA.
(More scientifically clueless lawyers making incorrect scientific decisions.)
Two things stood in the way
of Obama’s plan to use the EPA to destroy the economy:
Dr. Allan Carlin (scientist
employed 35 years by the EPA) submitted his 98 page technical review report on
the draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment (TSD) on March 9, 2009.
In that report Dr. Carlin strongly criticized the TSD for its dependence on the
Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC which had been so totally debunked. Obama
cleverly removed this obstacle by having EPA Director Lisa Jackson fire Dr.
Carlin after 35 years of service.
The EPA’s own Inspector
General issued a report critical of how the EPA conducts “science” and reaches
its already-determined “findings.” In that report the inspector general found
that the EPA failed to follow the Data Quality Act and its own peer review
process when it issued the determination that greenhouse gases cause harm to
“public health and welfare.” The IG report recommends that “the EPA revise its
assessment factors guidance to establish minimum review and documentation
requirements for assessing and accepting data from other organizations.” (ie.
IPCC) This IG report was essentially ignored and subsequently closed out by the
issuance of a “white wash” acknowledgement letter which vaguely promised future
compliance.
So armed to the teeth with
his own uncontrolled weapon of mass economic destruction, the EPA, Obama is
once again babbling the idiocy about saving the planet for our children by killing
all aspects of the fossil fuel industry including the total destruction of the
U.S. coal industry, stopping the Keystone pipeline project, and massive
inhibitive moves against utilization of our abundant oil shale resources.
CERTIORARI, OUR LAST HOPE
It is recognized that this
hideous economic atrocity is justified by a group of brilliant lawyers in the
DC Circuit and Supreme Courts (all of whom have zero background in science.) A
group of eminent climate scientists known as the Amici curiae has filed on
April 19, 2013 a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. (a
writ issuing from a superior court calling up the record of a proceeding in an
inferior court for review.) The petition says the following:
Amici curiae are well
qualified climate scientists. Amici include respected professors and scientists
who have worked for government agencies, universities, and businesses. These
highly regarded scientists have expertise in a wide array of fields implicated
by this rulemaking, including climate research, weather modeling, physics,
geology, statistical analysis, and engineering. They have many publications in
peer-reviewed journals and are respected in their fields of expertise by their
peers.
Amici wish to present to
this Court scientific data that bear directly on the underlying rulemaking.
Specifically, amici submit that EPA’s finding of human-caused global warming is
not supported by the evidentiary record that was before EPA.
“Amici believe that no
scientists have devised an empirically validated theory proving that higher
atmospheric CO2 levels will lead to higher Global Average Surface Temperature,
(GAST). Moreover, if the causal link between higher atmospheric CO2
concentrations and higher GAST is broken by invalidating each of EPA’s three
lines of evidence, then EPA’s assertions that higher CO2 concentrations also
cause sea-level increases and more frequent and severe storms, floods, and
droughts are also disproved. Such causality assertions require a validated
theory that higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations cause increases in GAST. Lacking
such a validated theory, EPA’s conclusions cannot stand. In science, credible
empirical data always trumps proposed theories, even if those theories are
claimed to (or actually do) represent the current consensus.”
“In short, EPA’s process was
far less rigorous than it should and could have been. And the court of appeals
erred in failing to recognize the deficiencies in it.”
CONCLUSION:
“For these reasons, and
those discussed more fully in the petitions, amici urge the Court to grant the
petitions for a writ of certiorari.”
(On June 6, 2013 the court ordered
further extension of the time to file response to petition to and including
July 22, 2013, for all respondents.)
With the Supreme court
experiencing extreme pressures and intimidation from the Obama administration
it is most likely that the petition will be denied, allowing the EPA to
continue its evil campaign to destroy our economy. Many economists agree that
the damage incurred by Obama and his EPA through 2016 would take decades to
repair if at all possible.
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment