From: Sen.Tiffany
[mailto:Sen.Tiffany@legis.wisconsin.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:15 AM
To: northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Feel free to publish it in your newsletter.
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:15 AM
To: northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com
Feel free to publish it in your newsletter.
TT
Subject: RE: Mining Legislation Update
Hi—thank you for sharing the
letter from Senator Jauch. Monday March 11th was a very good day for the
people of the state of Wisconsin .
With Governor Walker’s signature, we took the next step in putting the miner on
the flag of the state of Wisconsin back to
work. For over 40 years, except a brief interlude in the 90’s, mining has
not been allowed to help pull the load in the Badger State .
Act 1 is truly a 21st
Century Mining Bill. Concerns about mining from decades ago are
well-founded. However, our know-how and technology is exponentially
better than 50 years ago. My favorite example is where my excursion boat
operates on the Wisconsin River . The
Rhinelander paper mill used to befoul the river 50 years ago with sludge and
other toxic pollutants. Now we showcase loons and eagles and
nature’s majesty on that very same stretch of the river.
I believe mining is in a
very similar place as the paper industry was 50 years ago. With
advancements in knowledge and technology, heavy industry CAN coexist in a
modern economy.
Having said the above, I am
not going to dispel every misrepresentation in Senator Jauch’s letter. I
am simply going to point you to a few portions of the bill. You and your
friends decide what you choose to believe.
On page 31 of the
Legislative Council memo from January 14th under Groundwater Quality the memo
states, “The bill does not modify numerical groundwater quality standards and
surface water quality standards”. In the Legislative Reference Bureau
overview they say, “This bill incorporates all of the functional values and
criteria that are contained in the DNR rules for water quality standards for
wetlands”. Both Legislative Council and the Legislative Reference Bureau
are non-partisan agencies representing the legislature. They CANNOT take
a side in writing and reviewing legislation.
I challenge any of your
friends to review Chapter 140 of the natural resources rules that cover
groundwater emissions and tell me they do not apply in Act 1. We put the
numerical standards in current law, whether air, surface water and groundwater
in Act 1.
The problem in current law
can be summed up in a sentence from Page 3 of the previously mentioned
Legislative Council memo, “Current law does not provide a deadline by which an
application will be considered complete”. In other words, there is no
certainty that an application will ever be deemed complete. How do we
expect any company to consider doing business in Wisconsin if there is no deadline to receive
an answer? That is why we put in a ~3 year process for a permit to be
reviewed.
Now to a few of the bombastic
claims the good Senator from the 25th leveled at me and others:
Act 1 will allow
adverse environmental impacts. Yes, I did say that but so does current
law. How can you have a mine without having environmental
impacts? The key is to limit the impacts--which is required under
the bill. Furthermore, if the standard is going to be no environmental
impacts, are we going to stop building roads? Does Senator Jauch propose
shuttering the paper industry? Should the Monona Terrace have ever been
built when the good people of Madision decided to fill in 1.5 acres of Lake Monona
to build it?
Gogebic Taconite is an
out-of-state West Virginia coal company that
has environmental problems at its coal operations in Illinois . Since there are no mines in Wisconsin , is it surprising that an out-of-state company
is seeking to re-start mining in Wisconsin ?
In Minnesota , two of the four companies
operating on the Iron
Range are foreign
interests. Do opponents of mining prefer we seek out foreign companies
for Wisconsin mining?
Gogebic Taconite’s owners
took over an Illinois coal operation that had
been shuttered for a few years at the REQUEST of the state of Illinois . The mine had environmental
problems from a PREVIOUS owner. The company agreed to work with Illinois
EPA to resolve the environmental problems that existed PRIOR to GTac’s owners
acquiring the mine. In fact they have sunk dozens of wells to identify
the extent of the groundwater contamination and have worked diligently with
Illinois EPA to resolve the problem. Senator Jauch’s nasty allegation
tells very little of the real story. Is it any wonder Wisconsin has had a bad reputation for job
creators with such misinformation being disseminated by elected
representatives?
I wrote the Iron Ore Mining
Bill. Did I seek information from people involved in the mining industry,
yes, but I also met with many groups throughout the process the last two years
including environmental groups, regulatory agencies including in Michigan and Minnesota ,
Indian tribes and many others. In talking to long time Madison observers, this was one of the most
thoroughly debated issues in recent memory.
I understand some are simply
opposed to mining. But, I challenge those opponents to show where Wisconsin ’s current numeric
environmental standards are changed. I will be happy to discuss the
examples they find.
Finally, I believe in a
prosperous society like ours, we have an ethical obligation to produce some of
which we consume. Are we going to continue to out-source our
manufacturing to foreign countries that have less stringent environmental
regulations than us? If so, maybe it is time we put giant wind turbines
on the West Coast to blow southeast Asia’s emissions back to them. As a
kid, I was encouraged to think globally and act locally. Act 1 is a
perfect example of the people of Wisconsin
acting locally to do what is best for our planet.
You are welcome to forward
this message to others. I welcome calls anytime
to discuss this issue.
Senator Tom Tiffany
Northwoods Patriots - Standing up for Faith, Family, Country - northwoodspatriotscomm@gmail.com