The beginning of Common Core’s
trouble
Weekly Standard – Jamie Gass
and Jim Stergios – 5/29/2013
Rather than learn from
leading states like Massachusetts ,
Common Core draws from the so-called “21st century skills” movement, which
elevates soft skills like global
awareness, media literacy, cross-cultural flexibility and adaptability,
and creativity to equal footing with academic content. This less academic
approach has, in fact, been road tested in places like Connecticut
and West Virginia . Predictably,
the results have been dismal.
Common Core’s problems,
however, extend beyond academic
deficiencies. No estimate was ever performed to determine what it
would cost to implement the new
standards. In 2011, Pioneer Institute commissioned the first
independent, comprehensive cost study, which showed that transitioning states to the new standards will be $16.7 billion,
more than triple the amount of the federal Race to the Top inducements. Massive technology upgrades, training
and support, together with the purchase of new textbooks and instructional
materials, and professional development account for most of the expense.
And yet Race to the Top
favored a state’s grant application if it adopted Common Core. The U.S.
Department of Education subsequently awarded $362 million to directly fund two
national testing consortia to develop common nationalized assessments. The consortia
funding application clearly state that they will use federal funds to develop
curriculum materials and to create a “model curriculum” and instructional
materials “aligned with” Common Core. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan
himself noted that the consortia would develop “curriculum frameworks” and
“instructional modules.”
No comments:
Post a Comment